11/15/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Martha Bowden, Saddle Court, spoke to her concerns that there would not be enough critical mass of students at the junior high level to provide the appropriate education. She noted that there were 22 elective courses currently being provided at her children's school and questioned if this would even be viable with a K-8 school district. She also believed that the proposed transition to high school from the proposed K-8 school would not be good for the kids and explained that this was a critical development age for children and a time when important friendships are forged. The proposal would split the kids up and send them into two different districts. Bowden opposed redistricting and spoke to the letter posted on the PAUSD website from the County Office of Education that stated the Town's redistricting proposal was not permissible within the State Education Code. John Radford, La Paloma, offered that he had heard many good questions from the audience and appreciated the scrutiny the residents were expending on redistricting but questioned why the Los Altos School District were not being given the same careful examination and being asked the pertinent questions like how many Los Altos Hills students would be attending the reopened Bullis, when would Bullis be a full K-6 school and why was the District was mute on these topics and not answering questions. He reiterated his support for redistricting. Marlin Miller, Taaffe Road, commented that the Town was terribly fragmented between the many school districts and it was time to make a change. He suggested that residents should not be afraid of the quality of the education that would be provided under a new district and spoke to his confidence that the community would come together with the addition of a much needed neighborhood school. Shari Emling, Murietta Lane, voiced her support for redistricting and suggested that false information that was being disseminated by those opposed to the effort. She expressed her dissatisfaction with voting to approve school bonds and then seeing her tax dollars used to support schools in other communities. Chris Vargas, Templeton Place, summarized proposed solutions that he had heard over the course of the evening: 1/2 solution proposed by Los Altos School District (LASD) which would open Bullis school to serve half of the children of Los Altos Hills and most likely bring in children from Los Altos to fill the school; 3/4 solution which would ask LASD and Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD)to negotiate a way to put the BCS at the Bullis site and allow all Hills kids to attend and transfer parcel tax dollars to in effect establish a "proxy" district; and the full solution for the Town to build their own district and take control of their own education destiny. He questioned what the Council was willing to consider-he encouraged the Council to accept the full solution or 3/4 but not the '/2 solution. Vargas suggested that the Council reframe their statement to say that the solution was for future generations of residents. Brad Lyman, Wildflower Lane, expressed his belief that a community school was very important and a way for children to forge lasting friendships. He summarized his experience with the CPR effort to find a solution with the LASD and the fact that the • ultimate outcome of the weeks of meetings was no solution. Lyman expressed his 5 City Council Special Meeting Minutes November 15,2006