01/26/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

residents of the Town; and 3) to accept the Superintendent's offer to meet with the Standing Public Education Committee for an open dialogue on the issue of Public Education in Los Altos Hills. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Jones, seconded by Warshawsky and passed unanimously to approve a communication from Mayor Kerr (co-drafted by Councilmember Jones and Mayor Kerr) to Superintendent Tim Justus that would include the content points as defined by Councilmember Jones. Councilmember Jones, Council liaison to the Public Education Committee, introduced Public Education Committee Chair Duncan MacMillan to report out to Council on their recent efforts. Duncan MacMillan reported the Committee had been exploring the possibility of a Town wide solution to return public education to the Hills. He proceeded with a PowerPoint presentation titled"Proposal for a joint school/charter. MacMillan explained the return of public education as defined by the Committee would require the inclusion of the following components: neighborhood elementary school/s; attendance — area based (geographically based); Los Altos Hills residents would have priority in attendance; consideration of Palo Alto Unified School District and Los Altos School District enrollment; and a predictable and routine attendance. • He reviewed the Public Education Committee's issues with the most current Los Altos School District's "plans". MacMillan offered the District's proposal was "too little-too late" noting the 2008 start date and the lack of consideration of the Palo Alto Unified School District portion of the Town. MacMillan reviewed alternative scenarios that included: the Town reorganize into the Palo Alto Unified School District; Los Altos Hills forming its own K-8 or K-12 district; or,the existing Districts working together to open a joint school/charter. MacMillan noted that the Districts had been more responsive than previously to the Committee's requests for data including enrollment information. The Committee's findings supported the premise that current student enrollment justified a school in Los Altos Hills and the revenue stream from Los Altos Hills was substantial. He reviewed the enrollment numbers and financial data with Council that included property and parcel tax information and the dollars per Los Altos Hills students that went to each district. The Committee suggested that a solution that had a "piece-meal" approach by one of the Town's existing districts or allowed attendance to be open to an entire existing district was not a viable resolution to the issue. Committee consensus also supported that for the solution to be acceptable, Bullis Charter School be recognized as an asset to Los Altos Hills. MacMillan explained the Committee's reasons for the inclusion of the Bullis Charter School as a critical component in a solution was that it provided curriculum flexibility; preserved the number one performing charter school and number twelve • performing elementary school in the State; rewarded sweat and cash equity from the 6 City Council Meeting Minutes January 26,2006