Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor O'Malley polled the audience to identify which section had the highest number of <br /> public in attendance that wished to speak noting that the segments would be reviewed in <br /> that order. <br /> Les Earnest, 12769 Dianne Drive, addressed Council. He had three questions regarding <br /> the process: 1) did the plan consist of the map and the spreadsheet, 2) when would the De <br /> Anza trail be considered, and 3) would the email that he had sent to Council that <br /> identified errors in the map be addressed at tonight's meeting? <br /> Planning Director Carl Cahill explained the spreadsheet would be an exhibit to the map. <br /> Council moved forward with the public hearing. <br /> Council briefly discussed the De Anza trail alignment that was identified on the Draft <br /> path map. There was consensus to delete the De Anza trail alignment from the draft map <br /> and return it to the Pathways Committee for further consideration. <br /> SECTION(Study Zone)14 <br /> Chris Vargas, Pathways Chair, identified this area as the Hidden Villa to Rancho San <br /> Antonio zone. The Committee had walked the area and taken input from the residents. <br /> Vargas explained that the Committee identified the need for alternate routes into Rancho <br /> San Antonio and after much discussion and input from the Community, they had focused <br /> on proposed routes from Hidden Villa identified on the map by blue arrows (134.1, B4.2). <br /> The Committee had also voted by a narrow margin to retain two additional routes (133.28, <br /> • B3.30). The Planning Commission had felt that these were unnecessary due to traffic <br /> issues and the difficulty in controlling public access into the neighborhoods. Vargas <br /> concluded that before Council was the recommendation to retain alternate routes into <br /> Rancho San Antonio through Hidden Villa but not using the routes through residential <br /> areas. <br /> Bill Kerns, Planning Commission Chair, concurred with Vargas noting that the Planning <br /> Commissioners were recommending the elimination of two connections (133.28, B3.30) <br /> because of parking, safety and erosion concerns and were recommending the retention of <br /> potential future connections into Rancho San Antonio from Hidden Villa(134.1,B4.2). <br /> OPENED PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Patty Ciesla, 27150 Moody Court, expressed support for retaining connector B3.28. She <br /> opposed shifting the responsibility to Hidden Villa for a path into Rancho San Antonio. <br /> Chris Vargas explained that the Pathways Committee had voted to keep the loop however <br /> during discussions at the Planning Committee, it was determined that it did not satisfy <br /> any of the requirements in the Path Element for paths that included: connecting cul-de- <br /> sacs, connecting neighborhoods or leading to a public space. <br /> Nancy Ewald, resident, voiced her support for retaining an additional access into Rancho <br /> San Antonio. She was concerned that Hidden Villa might change in the future and there <br /> 3 <br /> City Council Special Meeting Minutes <br /> March 8,2005 <br />