Laserfiche WebLink
May Ip, 27520 Arastradero Road, supported the Planning Commissions recommendation <br /> to remove 131.8 and requested Council support for removal of connected segments ALL, <br /> A1.2, and A1.3b. <br /> Feng Yang, 27520 Arastradero Road, spoke in support of the Planning Commission's <br /> recommendation to remove path 131.8. He explained that it was very intrusive and <br /> redundant. <br /> Sopia Huang, 27580 Arastratero Road, presented a petition to Council with thirty <br /> signatures of her surrounding neighbors in support of removal of B1.8, A.1, A.1.2 and <br /> A1.3b. She offered that they were redundant. Huang noted that she had paid path-in-lieu <br /> fees when she had developed her subdivision and completed approximately 1000 linear <br /> feet of paths that connect to Purissima Road and Saddle Mountain Road. <br /> Carol Gottlieb, 24290Summerhill Avenue, noted that the path had been shown on the <br /> 1981 Master Path Plan with arrows. <br /> CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Mayor O'Malley poled the Council for any additional areas of discussion in Section 2. <br /> There were no additional items for discussion and Council discussion focused on ALL, <br /> A1.3 and 131.8. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Kerr spoke in favor of retaining A1.3b and locating it on the grassy knoll. <br /> • He opposed removing Al.1 and believed it would be beneficial if the Fenwick property <br /> were to be subdivided in the future. Kerr suggested that if Council voted to remove B1.8, <br /> that blue arrows be placed on the map indicating a future connector between Twin Oak <br /> Court and Al.1. <br /> Councilmember Warshawsky requested direction from the City Attorney on how Council <br /> should address any suggestions or additional items that are not identified on the map <br /> before them. City Attorney Mattas clarified that additional items could be accumulated at <br /> tonight's meeting and referred to the Pathways Committee and Planning Commission for <br /> review and the proper noticing. <br /> Councilmember Warshawsky supported the Planning Commission's recommendations <br /> for Section 2 and added that he would like to forward to the Planning Commission for <br /> further review locating arrows at the cul-de-sac. <br /> Councilmember Jones voiced his support for the Planning Commission's <br /> recommendations for the section. <br /> Councilmember Mordo offered that he had no issues with removing B 1.8 and he favored <br /> A1.3b on the grassy knoll as the least obtrusive location. He supported the Planning <br /> Commission's recommendation for Section 2. Mordo questioned if it would be possible <br /> to realign Al.1 further away from Lot 6. Pathways Chair Chris Vargas noted that this <br /> alternative was worth exploration and it would be reviewed. <br /> 8 <br /> City Council Special Meeting Minutes <br /> March 8,2005 <br />