Laserfiche WebLink
(6) The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has, in August 2018, interpreted <br />the federal preemption to generally prohibit local express moratoria and de facto moratoria on <br />wired and wireless telecommunications equipment, as such rules effectively suspend the review <br />and approval of permits and applications. Prohibited moratoria include local statutes, regulations, <br />or other written legal requirements that expressly or effectively prevent or suspend the acceptance, <br />processing, or approval 'of applications or permits necessary for deploying telecommunications <br />services and/or facilities. <br />(7) Similarly, section 7901 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes telephone <br />and telegraph corporations, which have been judicially determined to include wireless <br />telecommunications companies, to construct their facilities and lines along and upon any public <br />road or highway; and to erect poles, ancillary equipment, and other necessary fixtures of their lines, <br />in such manner and at such points as not to incommode the public use of the road or highway or <br />interrupt the navigation of the waters, <br />(8) On the other hand, section 79:01.1 of the California Public Utilities Code confirms <br />the right of municipalities to exercise reasonable control as to the time, place, and manner in which, <br />roads, highways, and waterways are accessed, which control must be applied to all entities in an <br />equivalent manner and may involve the imposition of fees. <br />(9) The recent FCC Order dated September 26, 2018, further interprets provisions of <br />the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to restate the preemption that local governments cannot enact <br />ordinances and regulations that `.`prohibit" or "effectively prohibit" the provision of <br />telecommunication services. Consistent with this interpretation, the Order further provides that all <br />local jurisdictions must comply with various restrictions on the exercise of local aesthetic, zoning, <br />public works, and fee restrictions when dealing with wireless installation siting applications. The <br />Order became effective on January 14, 2019, and the FCC further stated that it expects local <br />governments to be able to implement design, aesthetics, and other development regulations that <br />are compliant with the Order by April 15, 2019. <br />(10) Pursuant to FCC regulations, the Town cannot adopt a moratorium ordinance to toll <br />the time period for review for certain type of facilities, even when needed to allow the Town to <br />maintain the status quo while it reviews and revises its policies for compliance with changes in <br />state or federal law. The Town is in immediate need of clear regulations for wireless installations <br />in the public right-of-way given the number of anticipated applications and legal timelines upon <br />which the Town must act. <br />(11) The public right-of-way in the Town is a uniquely valuable public resource, closely <br />linked with the Town's natural beauty including the hills and views of the Bay, and significant <br />residential communities. The reasonably regulated and orderly deployment of wireless <br />telecommunications facilities in the public right--of-way is desirable, and .unregulated or disorderly <br />deployment represents an ever-increasing and true threat to the health, welfare and safety of the <br />community. <br />(12) The regulations of wireless installations in the public right-of-way are necessary to <br />protect and preserve the aesthetics in the community, as well as the values of properties within the <br />Ordinance 581 Page 2 <br />