My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/16/2018
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
2018
>
8/16/2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/25/2021 10:53:53 AM
Creation date
5/25/2021 10:53:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
08/16/2018
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />8 <br />City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 16, 2018 <br />Camas Steinmetz, Attorney with Aaronson, Dickerson, Cohn & Lanzone, San <br />Carlos, spoke in opposition to both applications. <br /> <br />Matthew Zinn, Attorney with Shute Mihaly & Weinberger, LLP, San <br />Francisco, spoke in opposition to both applications. <br /> <br />Art De Geus, Los Altos Hills, spoke in opposition to both applications. <br /> <br />Richard Partridge, Former Los Altos Hills Planning Commissioner, spoke <br />about lost opportunities in dealing with the applicant. <br /> <br />Mr. Hechtman provided a rebuttal to the public comment. <br /> <br />Forest Linebarger also provided a rebuttal to the public comment. <br /> <br />Meeting went into Recess at 9:17 p.m. <br />Meeting Reconvened to Open Session at 9:23 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Linebarger described a conversation he had in the past with a former <br />Planning Director for the Town. City Attorney Mattas then responded to Mr. <br />Linebarger's comments regarding the Planning Director's statements. <br /> <br />Mayor Radford closed the Public Hearing. <br /> <br />At the direction of the Mayor, the City Attorney suggested the Council ask <br />questions of staff and then the Council can determine whether to deliberate on the <br />issue and take action this evening or to continue the matter to another date and <br />time. Council discussion then ensued. <br /> <br />City Attorney Mattas explained that the staff reports presented to the Council <br />were a reflection of the decision of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wu said that after hearing all the testimony, she has been <br />worried about setting a precedent. She expressed concerns about other substandard <br />lots in the Mora Drive area and suggested that the Town should have a policy to <br />prevent development of substandard lots. <br /> <br />Mayor Pro Tem Spreen said he doesn't get issue fatigue and that we should find <br />what is reasonable in a situation like this with a unique, edge case property. A <br />house can be built, but it should be smaller. He believed that the Planning <br />Commission made the right decision and that the Town should uphold the denial of <br />the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Councilmember Corrigan said that one side isn't right and the other wrong, they <br />are both right in their approach and we must find a solution that works. She said <br />she is not willing to accept the appeal tonight. She thanked the applicant for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.