63-22 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In reviewing the public hearing records and other evidence presented before the Commission and City Council, there are also ample evidence showing that conditions relating to wildlife -friendly fencing and preservation of natural appearances at the subject property were reasonable to address specific concerns raised to the Planning Commission during the public hearings. At the outset, a portion of the subject property is located within an Open Space Conservation Area as shown on the Town's Land Use Diagram, and also contains steep sloped topography adjoining neighboring sites. There was testimony presented with respect to a 2006 potential wildlife movement corridor study conducted by Live Oak Associates showing the presence of wildlife movement at the subject property. Additionally, multiple neighbors, Town committee members, and the commissioners have provided testimony or voiced concerns about the proposed fencing restricting or preventing wildlife movement on the property due to sighting of deer. Although the applicant never specified the location of proposed plantings or crops, the Commission discussed during the public hearing configurations of fencing that could both protect potential crops to be planted and allow wildlife to move through the perimeters of the subject parcel. This included examples of alternative configurations from properties located at Natoma Road and Robleda Road. Ultimately, the Commission made modifications to the fencing design to incorporate wildlife -friendly fences at various points of the subject property to allow wildlife to pass through the site. There is no additional evidence suggesting that such configuration would prevent the applicant from using the property for agricultural purposes. The applicant has not made additional showings despite being given multiple opportunities to do so. The City Council notes that the height and setbacks of the proposed new fencing are compliant with standards set forth under the Fence Ordinance. However, such technical requirements are not the only considerations under the Municipal Code and zoning permits for fences are not issued in a ministerial manner. The Fence Ordinance was enacted to preserve the Town's natural characteristics and rural features while recognizing private property owners' ability to fence their properties. The Fence Ordinance and permit review ordinances specifically authorize the Planning Commission to approve zoning permits with reasonable conditions it deems necessary. Based on a review of the record below, the evidence and testimony received by the Commission and Council provide ample basis to determine that the March 3, 2022 Conditions of Approval were reasonable and necessary. Thus, the City Council finds that the Conditions of Approval imposed for the Zoning Permit on March 3, 2022 were reasonable and necessary for the proposed project and to achieve the purposes of the Fence Ordinance and the Municipal Code, and thus were within the Planning Commission's discretion to impose. The City Council further finds that there was substantial evidence in the record below to support the Planning Commission's approval of the Zoning Permit application with the Conditions of Approval imposed on March 3, 2022. 5120482.1 Resolution 63-22 Page 7