Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes DRAFT <br /> August 3, 2006 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Commissioner Harpootlian could not support floor area being counted twice. He felt that was <br /> artificially using floor area to restrict house size. <br /> Commissioner Carey noted the precedent of ceilings over 17 feet high being counted twice as <br /> floor area. <br /> Chairman Collins confirmed that the majority of the Commission supported the double counting <br /> of floor area over 10,000 square feet. <br /> Debbie Pedro asked the Planning Commission to discuss the setback issue. Ms. Pedro asked for <br /> clarification on the Commission's decision to double count floor area over 10,000 square feet <br /> and whether the effective floor area would be used for the purpose of setback requirements. <br /> Discussion continued among the Planning Commissioners and staff regarding the doubling of <br /> floor area over 10,000 square feet and the implications it held for setbacks,MDA and MFA. <br /> Debbie Pedro stated that for the purpose of implementing the ordinance it probably would be <br /> easier to use the effective floor area (double counted floor area) for all purposes. She suggested <br /> returning to the Commission with an improved setback chart that more clearly reflected the <br /> requirements. <br /> Commissioner Harpootlian asked for clarification on the Planning Commission findings required <br /> before approving an Estate Home in Attachment One. <br /> Brian Froelich, Assistant Planner, called attention to the required findings in Attachment 2 (page <br /> 3, G1-7) of the staff report. He explained that the findings are new and would not need to be <br /> addressed for projects other than Estate Homes. <br /> Commissioner Cottrell felt that the findings are were mandatory and wished to leave out the need <br /> for findings and require guidelines to be followed instead. <br /> Commissioner Carey felt he wanted to eliminate the required findings entirely and have staff <br /> move forward without it. <br /> Chairman Collins wanted to continue to try to make the findings work in the ordinance. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED: Motion by Commissioner Clow and seconded by <br /> Commissioner Cottrell to recommend that staff move forward with changes (eliminate G) to the <br /> ordinance and return to the Planning Commission at a future date. <br /> AYES: Commissioners Clow, Carey, Cottrell &Harpoothan <br /> NOES: Chairman Collins <br /> The Commissioners concluded that landscaping screening plans for Estate Homes should be <br /> reviewed by the Planning Commission. <br />