Laserfiche WebLink
CLOSED PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> • Following Council discussion, Council concurred that they would take no further action <br /> on this item. <br /> 5.3 Preferential Parking Districts Fees and Administration <br /> • Request for Reconsideration of Fees for Permitted Parking Permits- <br /> Sandy Mingia, Dawnridge Drive <br /> OPENED PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Sandy Mingia, Dawnridge Drive resident, addressed Council. She thanked Council for <br /> their efforts in establishing Dawnridge Drive as a permitted parking street. She was <br /> before Council, representing her neighbors, to request that Council reconsider the fee for <br /> the initialization fee for parking permits to $25.00 for five permits per residence versus <br /> the $25.00 for the first permit and $10 for each additional permit that was established by <br /> the adopted resolution. <br /> Resident,Dawnridge Drive, explained that her experiences with church parking in front <br /> of her home have been very difficult and unpleasant. She thanked Council for being so <br /> supportive of resident requests for assistance with this problem. She added that it is her <br /> opinion that some of her neighbors may not be able to afford the fee for permits and it <br /> would be very challenging to have to keep returning to the Town for permits. <br /> . Staff explained that the permits are good in perpetuity. <br /> Resident, Dawnridge Drive, voiced his opinion that he believed his taxes would pay for <br /> the expense the Town has incurred to establish the Permitted Parking Ordinance and <br /> regulations and he was surprised at the Town's efforts to recuperate administrative costs <br /> for the parking permits. <br /> CLOSED PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Brief Council discussion ensued. Council concurred that the fee schedule set by the <br /> original resolution was fare and appropriate. <br /> 6. NEW BUSINESS <br /> 6.1 Consideration of a Resolution of Support for the California High-Speed Rail <br /> Authority's Use of One of Two Alignments into the San Francisco Bay Area <br /> Councilmember Kerr explained that the resolution before Council for their consideration <br /> is well supported by the information in the Councilmember's packet. The resolution <br /> supports a Bay Area alignment for the proposed high-speed rail trains. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Kerr, seconded by O'Malley and <br /> • passed unanimously to adopt the resolution "Supporting the California High-Speed Rail <br /> Authority's Use of One of Two Alignments into the San Francisco Bay Area for the <br /> 5 City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> May 6,2004 <br />