Laserfiche WebLink
Items Removed: <br /> 4.1 Approval of Minutes: December 19, 2002 Regular Meeting <br /> The Mayor directed the Clerk to review the meeting tape for accuracy regarding the statement of <br /> Jim Abraham, 12831 Viscaino Road and to correct the statement if necessary . For the record, <br /> the Mayor clarified what Abraham meant by his statement should read... "He questioned why <br /> the plumbing lines were to be capped according to the drawings if the home was to be <br /> demolished. He feels this represents they did not intend to demolish the home when the <br /> drawings were done." <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Fenwick, seconded by O'Malley and <br /> passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the December 19, 2002 Regular City Council <br /> Meeting as amended with the following correction: page 16, Council vote should read: <br /> AYES: Mayor Fenwick, Mayor Pro Tem Cheng, and Councilmembers Kerr <br /> and Warshawsky <br /> NOES: Councilmember O'Malley <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> 4.2 Approval of Warrants: $236,963.86 (12/10/2002—01/08/2003) <br /> Mayor Fenwick noted that on page 5 of the warrant list the project description should read Tracy <br /> Court Bridge. Councilmember Kerr asked for clarification from the Administrative Services <br /> Director regarding geologist charges on the warrant list. It was explained that Cotton Shires is <br /> the Town's Geologist and their charges are billable to applicants. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Kerr, seconded by O'Malley and passed <br /> unanimously to approve the warrants of 12/10/02—01/08/2003 with the administrative correction <br /> of Tracy Court Bridge <br /> 4.5 Approval of Final Map, Lands of Kerns, 11888 Francemont Road Reso #2-03 <br /> Councilmember Warshawsky requested clarification from the City Attorney on the item before <br /> them. Steve Mattas explained the request for approval of the Final Subdivision Map was related <br /> to the Lands of Kerns. A Tentative Subdivision Map for the project was previously approved by <br /> Council and the Final Map is a requirement of the Subdivision Map Ordinance and State <br /> Subdivision Provisions. The Final Map must be submitted by the property owner to demonstrate <br /> that the project is in compliance with the conditions of approval and the approved Tentative Map. <br /> Town staff reviews the Final Map to ensure it is in compliance and sends it to Council for final <br /> action and approval. <br /> Councilmember Kerr questioned the existence of a pathway or pathway easements on the Final <br /> Map. Planning Director Cahill stated the pathway easement was previously granted and the <br /> • construction of the pathway is generally a condition of approval for a site development permit. <br /> 3 January 16,2003 <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br />