Laserfiche WebLink
Abraham pointed out that the committee was unable to reach a unanimous <br /> agreement on recommendations to the Council but the following were the <br /> recommendations from the majority of committee members: retain the <br /> LUF concept, apply the LUF factor as envisioned in Councilmember <br /> Fenwick's formula (Proposed ordinance, April 5, 2001 by <br /> Councilmember Fenwick: For parcels with LUF greater than .5, MDA <br /> =3750+(gross acre)(7500)+7500(LUF -.5); MFA = 3000+(gross <br /> acre)(2000)+(2000)(LUF-.5)) and approve the proposed MDA/MFA <br /> ordinance, address the visual impact changes resulting from the new <br /> formula, and address the discrepancies in lot definitions in various areas of <br /> the Town. Included in the report were comments and recommendations <br /> from other members of the committee. The report also included the <br /> following suggestions for further study: review grading policies to <br /> determine the likely impact on proposed ordinances, investigate the <br /> elimination of slope factor in MDA in favor of grading, retaining walls <br /> and caps similar to Portola Valley and complete drainage study addressing <br /> runoff generated by new ordinances. <br /> Council thanked the LUF Committee for their excellent report and for all <br /> of the time they worked on this project. Councilmembers asked.for some <br /> clarification of certain of the charts and made some suggestions. In part <br /> they recommended that the chart on lot size be shown in acreage and not <br /> square feet, that each page be titled and that the pages be numbered. A <br /> discussion followed on the report and the method of distribution to <br /> residents. Council reiterated that this report as well as the constrained lot <br /> ordinance and Town Survey results would be discussed at the May 17th <br /> Council Meeting with notification going to all residents. <br /> 3. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR <br /> 4. ADJOURNMENT <br /> There being no further new or old business to discuss, the City Council <br /> Meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> ��� <br /> atriciowd <br /> City Clerk <br /> The minutes of the April 26, 2001 Special City Council Meeting were <br /> approved at the May 17, 2001 Regular City Council Meeting. <br /> .10 <br /> April 26, 2001 <br /> Special City Council Meeting <br /> 2 <br />