Laserfiche WebLink
which encompassed the Los Altos Hills community. The hospital is a $350 million <br /> P tY P <br /> operation with approximately $750 million in assets. Staff consists of 2300 employees <br /> and numerous volunteers who support the care giving at the hospital. <br /> Graham proceeded with a video "Building Our Future". The presentation outlined the <br /> services provided by El Camino Hospital to Los Altos Hills. Graham noted that in 2006, <br /> 1448 inpatient discharges were from Los Altos/Los Altos Hills and over 2000 Los <br /> Altos/Los Altos Hills residents had visited the Hospital's Emergency Room. 2006 Tax <br /> dollar revenue to the Hospital from the two communities was $2,182,656.00 with Los <br /> Altos Hills providing $671,000.00 in support. <br /> Graham extended a personal invitation to the Council and city management to tour the <br /> new facilityand noted that pictorial updates of the construction were being featured on <br /> P p g <br /> the Hospital's website. Expectation was for the $480 million project to be completed in <br /> July 2009. <br /> In response to a councilmember inquiry, Graham explained that approximately 50% of <br /> LAH residents use the hospital's services with the remaining 25% going to Stanford <br /> Hospital and 25% elsewhere. <br /> Council thanked Mr. Graham for his presentation and for the excellent hospital services <br /> provided to the Los Altos Hills community by El Camino Hospital. <br /> • 3. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT <br /> Planning Director Debbie Pedro reported that the Planning Commission at their last <br /> meeting had reviewed two projects: a request for a fence on Simon Lane that was <br /> approved by a 3-2 vote; and the first draft of the General Plan update that included the <br /> Introduction, Open Space and Recreation Element and the Conservation Element. <br /> Pedro summarized the fence application for Council noting that the project called for a <br /> portion of a fence to be located along the edge of a 10 foot pathway easement. The future <br /> pathway easement had been removed from the Master Path Map by the City Council and <br /> there were no future plans to construct a physical pathway on the property. However, the <br /> applicant was required to leave a 10 foot opening to prevent obstruction of the path <br /> easement. Because the installation of the fence would have required removal of existing <br /> landscaping, the Commission voted to allow the fence to encroach 18 inches into the <br /> easement to accommodate the existing hedge. <br /> The General Plan update was currently scheduled to be forwarded to Council in April. <br /> The Commission recommended approval of the draft with some changes. <br /> Councilmember O'Malley appealed the Planning Commission approval of the fence <br /> application, Lands of Papp. He noted that he was appealing the approval to resolve a <br /> legal question regarding the technicality of pathway easements. O'Malley explained that <br /> • the City Council at the time they removed paths from the Master Path Map, had agreed <br /> that they were not abandoning the pathway easements owned by the Town. He was <br /> 2 <br /> City Council Meeting Minutes <br /> February 8,2007 <br />