30-05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

it S RESOLUTION NO.30-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS TO ADOPT A REVISED MASTER PATH PLAN TO REPLACE THE MASTER PATH PLAN OF 1981 WHEREAS, the Town of Los Altos Hills General Plan includes a Master Path • Plan of 1981 that designates certain off-road and roadside paths in Town; and WHEREAS, the City Council, in accordance with the 1996 Pathway Element has determined it is in the public interest to update the Master Path Plan with regard to the off-road pathways system to reflect current resident needs; and WHEREAS, the Pathways Committee recommended that to the Planning Commission that the General Plan Master Path Plan of 1981 be amended to delete certain planned off-road pathways and to add certain proposed off-road pathways; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Pathways Committee's recommendation and recommended certain amendments to the General Plan Master Path Plan of 1981 as shown on the 2005 Off-Road Path Plan, dated February 10, 2005 and labeled version 3.0 (attached to the March 8, 2005 City Council Staff Report ["the City Council Staff Report"]) and as further described on the spreadsheet labeled "Town of Los Altos Hills Master Pathway Plan: Offroad Pathway Recommendations" (which was attached to the City Council Staff Report as Attachment 4); and WHEREAS, the Town of Los Altos Hills, as Lead Agency for the environmental review of this update and amendment has prepared an initial study and mitigated negative declaration and finds that the project, as mitigated, will have no significant environmental impacts upon the environment; and WHEREAS, the specific facts supporting the statements in this Resolution are set out in more detail in the February 10 Planning Commission Staff Report and the City Council Staff Report; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does RESOLVE as follows: 1. As to Study Zone 3 on the 2005 Off-Road Path Plan: a. The Planning Commission Recommendation regarding pathway segments A2.10b and A2.11 is accepted, by a 4-0-1 vote with Mayor O'Malley abstaining due to a potential conflict of interest.