Laserfiche WebLink
S <br /> RESOLUTION NO 4 3—0 5 <br /> Attachment B (Page 2 of 2) <br /> APPLICATION DOCUMENTS: TDA ARTICLE 3 <br /> BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROJECT <br /> Project Eligibility: YES?/NO? <br /> A. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? (If"NO,"on YES <br /> the next page provide the approximate date approval is anticipated). <br /> B. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? If"YES,"provide NO <br /> an explanation on the next page. <br /> C. For"bikeways,"does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria YES <br /> pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual?(Available <br /> on the Internet at:http://www.dot.ca.gov/ho/oppd/hdm/chapters/t1001.htm). <br /> D. Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee?(If"NO," YES <br /> provide an explanation on the next page). <br /> E. Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for NO <br /> the project(pursuant to CEQA)been evidenced by the dated stamping of the <br /> document by the county clerk or county recorder? (If"NO"provide and <br /> explanation on the next page;and note that MTC cannot allocate funds to a <br /> project which lacks environmental clearance). <br /> F. Will the project be completed within the three fiscal year time period(including YES <br /> the fiscal year of funding)after which the allocation expires? Enter the <br /> anticipated completion date of project(month and year)6-30-2006 <br /> G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, YES <br /> or has the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an <br /> agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: <br /> E. Notice of Exemption to be filed with the County Clerk prior to final <br /> design. <br />