88-05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Resolution A Resolution of the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills Supporting High Speed Rail to the Bay Area and Membership in the Silicon Valley High Speed Rail Coalition Whereas, a high-speed rail line connecting northern and southern California would relieve highway and air traffic congestion between the San Francisco Bay Area and Los Angeles, which is one of the busiest air traffic corridors in the nation. Whereas, the California High -Speed Rail Authority, the organization responsible for planning, designing, constructing, and operating the state's proposed high-speed rail system, currently intends to run the first leg between Los Angeles and San Francisco through San Jose/Silicon Valley. Ultimately, the line would be extended to Oakland, Sacramento and San Diego. Whereas, the California High -Speed Rail Authority originally recommended two alignment options—(a) through the Pacheco Pass; or (b) a series of tunnels through the Diablo Range—to bring high-speed rail into the San Francisco Bay Area through San Jose/Silicon Valley. The line would then split, with one set of tracks paralleling the Caltrain Commuter Rail Corridor up the Peninsula to San Francisco and the other set running up the East Bay to Oakland. Whereas, the California High -Speed Rail Authority concluded that entering the Bay Area from the south would offer: (a) faster travel times; (b) more frequent service to San Jose/Silicon Valley, San Francisco and Oakland; (c) higher ridership; and (d) more revenue. Whereas, the California High -Speed Rail Authority considered and rejected one other Bay Area alignment, the so-called Altamont Pass alignment. Following this route, the high-speed rail trains would enter the Bay Area over the Altamont Pass to Union City. From Union City, the trains would then split into three lines—one south to San Jose/Silicon Valley, another north to Oakland and a third to San Francisco over a new bridge across the bay. Whereas, the California High -Speed Rail Authority originally concluded that the Altamont Pass alignment would be problematic from an operational and environmental standpoint. According to the authority, splitting the service into three lines would reduce train frequencies and ridership, while substantially increasing operating costs. In addition, the authority concluded that the Altamont Pass alignment was impractical because of the costs associated with building a new rail bridge across San Francisco Bay and the environmental hurdles that would need to be overcome to do so.