Laserfiche WebLink
4.4 Approved grant of conservation easement, Lands of Rocchetti and Herdell, <br /> 27371 Moody Road—Reso#72-00 <br /> 4.5 Accepted the traffic stripes and pavement marking project CIP99-00, Crisp <br /> Company—Reso#73-00 <br /> 4.6 Accepted dedication of right of way, Lands of Davar, 26541 Purissima Road— <br /> Reso#74-00 <br /> 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> 5.1 Report on status of path between Voorhees and Miraloma Way <br /> Cheng stepped down from consideration of this item as this pathway discussion involved <br /> her property. <br /> The Public Works Manager referred to his staff report (on file at Town Hall) which <br /> outlined the history of this issue. In this report he noted that the maintenance department <br /> had never maintained a path between Voorhees and Miraloma although the Pathways <br /> Committee had advised him that people had used this path for years. The Public Works <br /> Manager also noted that the Town had a pathway easement in this location but not a <br /> pathway. He stated that when he was advised to construct a pathway in this easement he <br /> would follow the usual procedure which included notifying the affected property owners <br /> and surveying and staking the easement to determine if there were any encroachments <br /> into the easement. If there were encroachments, the Town would work with the property <br /> owners and route the pathway to minimize the impact of the encroachments or ask to <br /> have them removed. Addressing the issue of a permit for a tennis court on the Chengs' <br /> property in 1989, the Public Works Manager noted that a condition of approval stated <br /> that the pathway along the southerly border was to be cleared prior to release of the final <br /> building deposit. Since there were two pathway easements along the southerly border it <br /> was difficult to determine which pathway was being addressed. However the deposit <br /> was returned so the assumption was that'the condition had been met. The Public Works <br /> Manager had advised Mrs. Cheng that there was no code violation. He further advised <br /> her that the Town had a pathway easement and the right to use that portion of her <br /> property for a pathway but to date the Town had not exercised that property right. <br /> Les Earnest, 12769 Dianne Drive, stated that he disagreed with the Public Works <br /> Manager's report. Mr. Earnest referred to his memo which outlined the history of this <br /> path. According to this report in 1980 the Town of Los Altos Hills Master Path Plan <br /> showed a public pathway between the ends of Voorhees Drive and Miraloma Way and <br /> in 1982 the parcel map showed a ten foot pedestrian/equestrian easement along the <br /> • <br /> October 5, 2000 <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> 3 <br />