Laserfiche WebLink
maximum height; and 2) recommended approval of ordinance amending Sections 10- <br /> 1.1109 <br /> 0-1.1109 and 10-2.1313(b) of the Municipal Code regarding appeals from decisions. <br /> 4. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> Items Removed: 4.1 (Dauber), 4.2 (Dauber) and 4.7 (Public Works Manager) <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Cheng <br /> and passed unanimously (with Dauber abstaining on Item 4.9) to approve the balance <br /> of the Consent Calendar, specifically: <br /> 4.3 Approved grant of Conservation Easement, Lands of Montebello <br /> Development, 27855 Moody Road—Reso#56-00 <br /> 4.4 Approved response to Civil Grand Jury Report <br /> 4.5 Awarded contract for the sanitary sewer repair project—Reso #57-00 <br /> 4.6 Awarded contract for the pavement and storm drainage improvements <br /> project CIP99-00 and amendment to capital improvement budget <br /> —Resolutions#58-00 and#59-00 <br /> 4.8 Adopted Resolution establishing standing committees and adopting <br /> general and special rules pertaining thereto—Reso#60-00 <br /> 4.9 Approved site development permit for a new two-story residence, <br /> Lands of Noghrey, 27935 Roble Blanco Court(Fast Track) <br /> Items Removed: <br /> 4.1 Approval of Minutes: July 20, 2000 (Regular Meeting) <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Dauber, seconded by Casey and <br /> passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the July 20, 2000 City Council <br /> Meeting with the following corrections: page 2, Item 2.2, add the following to the first <br /> paragraph: "Dauber expressed a desire to first interview the applicants noting that the <br /> committee would not be able to meet until there was a third applicant anyway."; page <br /> 4„ Item 4.9, add the following to the second paragraph: "The City Attorney reported <br /> that the applicants had opted to dedicate the same amount of land that they were <br /> removing from conservation easement when they learned that to vacate an easement <br /> was a complicated process but to relocate an easement (a summary vacation) was <br /> relatively simple. The Acting Planning Director noted that according to the <br /> applicants' engineer the area where they were planning to put in the conservation <br /> easement was 30% slope. In addition he noted that in the absence of Planning <br /> August 17, 2000 <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> 2 <br />