06/15/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

establishing appropriate encroachment permit fees for the variety of encroachment conditions encountered: project review $300, plan check - $150 per drawing or sketch - $150 minimum, construction inspection- $1.76/feet of trench- $176 minimum, and street impact - $4.80/feet of trench - $60 minimum; and direct staff to investigate and recommend to the City Council an appropriate method to collect fees for construction in the public right of way to include Town costs and the impact of construction in public streets. 5.2 Discussion of path in lieu fees PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue this discussion to the next Council Meeting. Casey did note that the fees should covers the costs and Dauber recommended the residents be given the option of putting in the path if they wanted to. 6. NEW BUSINESS 6.1 Approval of General Plan Survey Questions Paul Crawford, representing Crawford Multari Clark & Mohr, commented that it had been a pleasure working with the Land Use Committee and staff on the survey project • before Council at this time. He also commented in general on the number of questions that should be included in a survey to encourage a willingness to participate. In general this is no more than four pages. Johnson thought this was an excellent questionnaire but believed some of the questions were duplicates of those asked in the census and were of no use to the Town. These questions included those referring to age, gender, race and income. Casey believed it was important that the terminology used should be understandable to the residents. For example a resident may not understand what was meant by outdoor lighting, off-road and on-road paths and basements as these terms were used by the Town and in the survey. Dauber believed current policy and how it was implemented needed to be distinguished. She also suggested a cross reference between the primer and the survey. Council thanked the consultant for his work on this survey. They thought it was a good start but needed more review and comment and modification before finalized. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to send the community survey to the Planning Commission for review and comment and report back to the Council. Council further directed that the consultant did not need to participate in this level of review by the Planning Commission. In addition it was agreed Councilmembers would send their comments on this issue to the Planning Commission. June 15, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting 8