12/02/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4.6 Accepted grant of a conservation easement, Lands of Chase and Arnold, 12180 Kate Drive—Reso#72-99 4.7 Accepted grant of conservation easement, Lands of Dykes, 12200 Kate Drive— Reso #73-99 4.8 Accepted grant of conservation easement, Lands of Golukhov, 11195 Hooper Lane— Reso #74-99 4.9 Accepted irrevocable offer of dedication of right of way, Lands of Golukhov, 11195 Hooper Lane—Reso #75-99 Items Removed: 4.1 Approval of Minutes: November 4, 1999 (Regular Meeting) November 18, 1999 (Special Meeting) November 18, 1999 (Regular Meeting) MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Dauber, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the November 4, 1999 Regular City Council Meeting with the following corrections: page 4 add the following to the beginning of the page: "Dauber felt that it was unreasonable for a candidate to have to run for election twice in one year. Since • Council really did not know exactly when Councilmember Siegel would be leaving,they could just wait until he knew he would be leaving and appoint someone at that time; page 5, Item 6.3, add the following sentence after `Johnson stated that he did not believe the nexus was there and the appeal would be rejected by the Board.' —"However, he did think we should try."; page 6, Item 8.1.2, Michael Scott's comments should read" commented favorably on his experiences with the firm of Stoecker and Northway."; and the last sentence of Sharyn Brown's comments should read: "It was agreed that the committee should go ahead and plant as long as it was not in an area that would be disturbed since these decisions could take some time." MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Dauber, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the November 18, 1999 Special Meeting with the following corrections: page 3, fourth paragraph, first four sentences should read: "Casey questioned the process noting that nothing built on Finn's property was a violation of the Town's Codes. The Planning Director pointed out that building without a permit was a violation. Casey questioned staff regarding others who had done work on their property without permit who were able to apply for and get a permit after the fact. To her knowledge this was the process when the work done was not a code violation as in the Finn Site Development Permit application; page 3, fourth paragraph, sixth sentence should read: "In particular the finding that the placement of the schoolhouse would require minimal grading when in fact much grading was done." • December 2, 1999 Regular City Council Meeting 2