06/03/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

word 'interested' stays in: 15) P. 3, item (b)(12), revise to read: "Appeals of the Planning Director's decision may be made in writing by any impacted interested party, including by any Councilmember or antwo (2) Planning Commissioners, not later than the date and time of the City Council's consideration of the item on its consent agenda, or not later than twenty-one (21) days after the site development decision hearing in the event that no Council meeting is scheduled." MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Dauber, seconded by Johnson and passed unanimously to agree that not later than twelve (12)months after the effective date of this ordinance, staff shall initiate a review of the effectiveness of the ordinance. The review shall be made at a public hearing by the City Council, subsequent to review and recommendation by the Planning Commission. In addition periodic reports will be made to Council by the Planning Director. This motion is not to be a part of the ordinance but rather direction from Council. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Dauber and passed by the following roll call vote to add design guidelines to section 1.(e) at the end of the first sentence. AYES: Mayor Johnson and Councilmembers Dauber and Siegel NOES: Councilmembers Casey and Finn Casey and Finn believed the design guidelines were very subjective and should not be referenced. • MOTION MADE AND FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND: Motion made by Dauber and failed due to lack of a second to add the following section 2(a)(5): "The project is of average or below average size as compared with projects from the previous year." MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Casey and passed by the following roll call vote to direct the City Attorney to revise the ordinance to reflect the changes made by Council and to bring the ordinance back to the next Council Meeting for first reading. AYES: Mayor Johnson and Councilmembers Casey and Finn NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Dauber and Councilmember Siegel Siegel stated that if the enhancements and fast track were separated into two parts he would vote for the fast track. However, he found the findings for the enhancements difficult to make. 12. CLOSED SESSION: 12.1 PERSONNEL; PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT, Government Code Section 54957--City Manager 12.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION, Government Code Section 54956.9(b) Significant Exposure to Litigation: ABAG Recommendation for Mar Claim June 3, 1999 Regular City Council Meeting 10