06/03/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jay Shideler, 27994 Via Ventana, supported fast track but not the Planning Commission's recommended changes. He believed subjectivity should be removed and the Planning Commission should be mediators. Valerie Stitt, 25703 Lomita Linda, noted that she was in the process of building a home in the Town. She noted that the Commission tended to comment on matters of style rather than compliance with the codes. Rick Ellinger, 28520 Matadero Creek Lane, supported the fast track concept but reiterated his suggestion of a parallel of process. To facilitate applications,reviews are conducted by staff, Commission,Pathways Committee and/or Site Development simultaneously with a two-week window to make comments. Council reviewed the specific recommendations made by the Planning Commission. They noted that recommendations#4,7,8,9,12,13 and 16 were non controversial and simply clarified the ordinance. MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Siegel and passed unanimously to approve the following recommendations: 4. P. 2, item (a)(3), revise to read: "There is no substantive neighborhood opposition to the project, ("substantive" is not based on the number of neighbors objecting)." 7. P. 2, item (b)(4), second sentence, revise to read: "The hearing shall take place at the date and time specified in the notice, but the Director shall make every effort to accommodate the schedules of all interested parties, including continuing the day • and/or time of the meeting if necessary." 8. P. 2, item (b)(5), first sentence, revise to read: "Environmental Design Committee and Pathways Committee representatives may ;hallhe :.,•.:toa +e participate..." 9. P. 3, item (b)(6), first sentence, revise to read: "An interim staff report shall be prepared at least five(5) days prior to the hearing." 12. P. 3, item (b)(9), last line, revise to read: "...whether the opposition is supported by facts or relevant information." 13. P. 3, item (b)(10), last line, revise to read: "...Planning Commission, a minimum of ten(10) dqys prior to the end of the appeal period." 16. P. 4, item (c)(3), revise to read: "There is substantive neighborhood opposition to the project("substantive" is not based on the number of neighbors objecting)." MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Finn, seconded by Casey and passed by the following roll call vote to not accept the following recommendation: 1.) P. 1, item (e), last phrase, revise to read: "...shall not be considered or altered by the Site Development Authority, unless the Authority makes both findings listed under subsection below." AYES: Mayor Johnson and Councilmembers Casey, Finn and Siegel NOES: Mayor Pro Tem Dauber June 3, 1999 Regular City Council Meeting 8