07/10/1967 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNIi{G CCP�cywl0id TOJl OF LC.' ALTOS.,TLL:: NINUTE:j CA R ULAR vE3TTNG J:ly IC, 1967 Chairman 1. 'r. Kinckley called 'the meeting to order at 7:55 P. A., at the Town Hall, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California. Th, following members were present: Commissioners Bowler, Dawson, Hibner, Lachenbruch, Perkins, Snerlock and Chairman Ninckley. Absent: None. Councilman ':,alter A. Benson represented the Council. Ainutes of the regular meeting of June 26, 1967 were unanimously approved APPROVAL as mailed upon 6otion by Commissioner Sherlock and Seconded by Commis- OF sioner Hibner. I9INUTES Communication addressed to Chairman u. F. Hinckley from Gordon d. COHAUNi- Bowler, dated June 27, 1967, regarding General Concept for Parks, C.TIONS Recreation and Open Space in Los Altos Hills, was read by Chairman Minckley. Communication addressed to Chairman d. F. winckley from Gordon E. Bowler, dated June 15, 1967, regarding Planning for the Future of the Town of Los Altos Hills, was read by Chairman Mincklay. Chairman 7-iinckley instructed the Secretary to forward copies of the ACTION above communications to the Commissioners so that a discussion could be held at a Study Session and later presented for a Public hearing, since the subject matter was appropriate to consider in view of the Commission's discussions on open space and future Town planning. Commissioner Lachenbruch announced teat at the last meeting of the PTicl- Peninsul.a Foothills Planning Committee he was elected Vice -Chairman. ANNOUNC3- Slone density was discussed at this meeting, and Cam. Lachenbruch H,314TL states he would take up the subject -:::atter at the Study Session. Chairman :Minckley reported that the work program for the County of Santa Clara Planning Policy Committee as been presented and announced that he '. ,ad been appointed to the Hillside Committee, as well as tae Parks and Open Spaces Committee, and he could appropriately soundout the feelings around the County. He also stated that what is decided by this Commission would be carried by min: to the County Planning Policy Committee to hopefully tie in with County plans. Staff read City :Attorney's letter dated July 10, 1967 regarding COMMITT 2 Pathway Committee report on asements, which was in answer to the RaPORTS- Planning Comssission's request as state2 in its Minutes of 6/25/67. CITY ATTORNEY Foregoing letter was discussed, with particular reference to Para. 2, ON EASEKANTS regarding general purpose easements. It was felt that perhaps the (a) City Attorney aas mislead by the term "general purpose easement". Chairman oinckley specifically questioned, "Can the Town use previously dedicated utility easements as a dual pathway easement or is it necessary to make a re -agreement?" The City I+tanager reported that the City Attorney stated this can be done by recording a new and specifically named easement.