Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS <br />to MINUTFS OF A RaGULAR MELTING <br />October 9, 1967 <br />Chairman ✓d. F. Hinckley called the meeting to order at 7:46 P. M, at the <br />Town Hall, 26379 Bremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California. The following <br />members answered Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Bowler, Dawson, Hibner, <br />Perkins, Sherlock, Chairman Minckley. Absent: Commissioner Lachenbruch. <br />Council was represented by Councilman 'Halter A. Benson. <br />APPROVAL OF MLYUTBS: September 25, 1967. <br />Commissioner Dawson stated that because he was not present at the last <br />Planning Conaaission meeting, the Amended Motion was not clear regarding the <br />building site approval of Rudi Ligtelyn (BSA -35-67), P. 3, Para. 3. <br />Commissioner Hibner was of the opinion the Motion should be ariended to in- <br />clude that tae private road be brought up to maximum road standards of 16', <br />since he was sure he had stated this Motion in accordance with the Fire Chief's <br />recommendation and that the Motion had passed. However, Commissioner Bowler <br />stated that at the time he voted he lid not understand the Motion to call for <br />above the minimum width and if this were the intent of the 14otion, he would <br />06 withdraw his vote of approval on the Ligtelyn building site approval. Com- <br />nissioner Bowler questioned the basis on which the higher width would be <br />called for on service of two lots and stated the Town has a standard and <br />wanted it known whether the standards were being challenged. <br />City Manager pointed out that during the September 25th meeting, the Amended <br />Motion was made without a Second to require a 16' width but in discussion was <br />changed to read "in accordance with the recommendations of the City engineer" <br />and so published and approved by the City Council. <br />Commissioner Bowler stated he objects to the requirements of the Fir,_ Chief <br />in that there are other considerations besides fire safety. Commissioner <br />Hibner pointed out the standard specifications call for a paved width of 1^- <br />16' on a private road with 24' to 32' rights of way. <br />Tire City Engineer stated the determination of a 14' or 16' width is dependent <br />upon whether aspu:alt berms are required on the driveway. If none, then the <br />14' width, if berms are constructed, then 161. If a drainage problem, it <br />would necessitate a berm and the 16' width required. <br />Cormissioner Hibner said he would accept the recormendat ions of the City <br />angineer, and the Motions remained uncorrected as published; however, a <br />correction was made to the format correcting "Amended Motion" to 'Amendment <br />to the kotion'. <br />MOTION, SBCONDED & CARRIED: Commissioner Perkins moved; seconded by <br />Commissioner Sherlock, and unanimwsly carried by voice vote, that the <br />Minutas of September 25, 1967 be approved as corrected. <br />