09/14/1970 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

C19 PLANNING COMMISSION TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING September 14, 1970 Chairman Weisbart called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the Town of Los Altos Hills to order at 7:52 P. M. at the Town Hall, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California. The following members answered roll call: Present: Commissioners Corbett, Hibner, Lachenbruch, Perkins, Spencer and Chairman Weisbart. Absent: Commissioner McReynolds. COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE: Councilman Mary Davey. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 10, 1970 Commissioner Perkins moved, seconded by Lachenbruch and carried unanimously that the minutes of August 10, 1970, be approved as written. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 24, 1970 Commissioner Perkins moved, seconded by Corbett and carried unanimously that the minutes of August 24, 1970 be approved with the following amendment: Page 2, Old Business, Item $2, Paragraph 6, first sentence should read: The question was posed as to how the amount of in -lieu path fees could now be determined since the cost varied with the quality of paths desired and'bhe consensus was that the payment be 100% of the estimate for the path specified". 1. Staff advised of a letter from Mr. Alan Lambert to the Council which they had referred to the Planning Commission. Mr. Lambert requested changes to the Final Map for Monte Lucero Unit H3. The Commission agreed to agenda this matter later in the meeting. OLD BUSINESS: 1. MUNOZ. 80I RT M. (V-343-70) Variance request for reduction of front setback from 40' to 16'.6 for garage addition at 13460 Robleda Road. Continued. Staff reviewed the variance application of Mr. Munoz who had applied for a variance to allow him to locate his garage within 1611' of a public easement line. This matter was considered on June B, 1970 by the Planning Commission and the action taken was to reschedule this matter for further consideration within three months due to pending litigation on abandonment of an easement. The litigation to determine the status of the S' right-of-way easement between his property and Burke Road was still in process and Mr. Munoz stated that this may not be solved for some time. He, therefore, asked the Planning Commission to take action on his request for a variance for his garage. He further stated that he preferred his garage set as originally requested, but he would be willing to move it back even with the front of his house, if absolutely necessary.