Laserfiche WebLink
Ile- <br />PLANNING <br />� .a <br />r <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />TOWN OF Los ALTOS HILLS <br />r MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING <br />` September 27, 1971 <br />R 10 Side 1 Track 1 OO -End <br />Side 2 Track 1 00-55 <br />Chairmen McReynolds called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the <br />Town of Los Altos Hills to order at 7:45 P.M. at the Town Hall, 26379 Fremont Road, <br />Las Altos Hills, California. The following members answered roll call: Commission - <br />ere Lachenbruch, Mueller, Magruder, Perkins, Spencer, Weisbart, and Chairman Mc- <br />Reynolds. Absent: None. <br />ANNOUNCEMENTS: <br />1. City Manager advised that the League of California Cities meeting in process <br />in San Francisco would discuss "planning areas" on September 28. Topics include <br />bike path plans and mobile home parks. <br />2. Mid -Peninsula Citizens for Fair Housing extended an invitation to attend a wine <br />tasting reception on October 17 at the Stanford Linear Accelerator, <br />DIVISIONS CF LAND: Tentative Maps: <br />1. MUTTER EDWARD A. (382-71) 2 lots 2.7 gr. acres, Is Paloma Road. Engr. M.W. <br />Wolff. <br />Staff reviewed that this 2.7 gross acre property has an existing dwelling located on <br />the rear of the lot and that the applicant wished to subdivide to create a new <br />building site fronting on Is Paloma Road. This property as well as the neighboring <br />Hoover property is served by a private drive which straddles their common lot line <br />and is comprised of each aides 6' easements. Staff recommended that a rolled curb <br />and gutter be installed along the LaPaloma frontage and that the pavement be ex- <br />tended to the gutter; that the applicant grant a 20' easement along parcel #1 <br />so that the existing drive would remain a private road, but be constructed to Town <br />standards along that portion. Staff explained that a private road must be located <br />in a 40' right of way, but suggested the remaining 20' easement could be obtained <br />from the adjacent property owner if and when they subdivide. Staff also recommended <br />that the existing 16" drain under the drive be replaced with a 36" pipe. <br />A communication from an attorney representing the neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. William <br />Hoover indicated they had no intention of subdivision and requested denial of the <br />Mutter application, since construction of the private roadway without their consent <br />(which they did not intend to grant) violated a decree recorded October 4, 1954. <br />Staff stated that this decree referred to a since expired deed restriction upon <br />these parcels created by the Iyandale Knolls Subdivision. To avoid any dissention <br />with the neighbor, the applicant proposed that access to lot #1 be directly off of <br />Is Paloma and that the present road be left as is to serve the existing residences. <br />Commission discussion concurred with Staff's recommendation since minimal access to <br />Is Paloma would be provided. Commissioner Mueller expressed reservations as to the <br />adequacy of drainage provision due to the proximity of the creek crossing lot #1 <br />as it related to the potential building site. The majority of the Commission felt <br />Lany overflow would run toward LaPaloma, rather than toward the homesite. <br />MOTION, SECONDED AND CARRIED: Commissioner Spencer moved, seconded by Perkins and <br />carried by majority vote that the Tentative Map of E. A. Nutter (382-71) for 2 lots <br />be recommended to the Council for approval in accordance with the check list dated <br />September 27, 1971. (Commissioner Mueller voted no.) <br />