My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-03
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
2003
>
05-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2016 8:36:53 AM
Creation date
11/18/2014 3:24:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Number
5-03
Date
2003-01-16
Description
Urging the California Legislature to Reject the Governor's Proposed Shift of Local VLF Revenues and to Honor the 1998 Commitment to Restore the VLF
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 5-03 <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br /> TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS <br /> URGING THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO REJECT THE GOVERNOR'S <br /> PROPOSED SHIFT OF LOCAL VLF REVENUES AND TO HONOR THE <br /> 1998 COMMITMENT TO RESTORE THE VLF <br /> WHEREAS, prior to 1935, cities and counties collected property taxes on motor <br /> vehicles to fund essential local public health and safety services; <br /> WHEREAS, in 1935, the Legislature first enacted the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) <br /> Act, replacing the property tax on vehicles with a 1.75 percent fee charged against the <br /> value of the motor vehicle; and <br /> WHEREAS, in 1948, the rate of the VLF was increased to 2 percent of the value <br /> of the vehicle; and <br /> WHEREAS, in 1986, the voters voted overwhelmingly to constitutionally <br /> dedicate the proceeds of the VLF to fund city and county services; and <br /> WHEREAS, in 1998, a period of strong economic growth, the Legislature <br /> approved the use of a portion of the rapidly growing state General Fund to reduce the <br /> VLF payments of vehicle owners. This amount, known as the "offset", grew in future <br /> years to a 67.5percent offset against the amount owed. The amount paid to local <br /> governments in lieu of the reduced VLF payment is known as the "VLF backfill"; and <br /> WHEREAS, the 1998 legislation and subsequent enactments contain clear <br /> provisions that when insufficient funds are available to be transferred from the General <br /> Fund to fully fund the offsets and backfill amount that the VLF offset shall be reduced <br /> and VLF payments increased; and <br /> WHEREAS,VLF and backfill revenues constitute 15 to 25 percent of typical city <br /> and county general purpose revenues. On average, more that 60 percent of city general <br /> fund spending and more than half of county general funds go to front line law <br /> enforcement, fire, emergency medical services, and health care program; and <br /> WHEREAS, revenues derived from the VLF and backfill are of critical <br /> importance in funding vital local public health and safety services; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.