Laserfiche WebLink
3. Compound wall: <br /> - If the proposed compound wall requires us to alter any of the existing <br /> driveway/drainage flow/removal of plants or trees etc, adequate time needs to be <br /> given for the review/comment on the proposal as well as adequate time for making <br /> such modifications. <br /> 4. Location& Height: <br /> The current location of the building is acceptable as long as <br /> a) Location: Privacy and drainage aspects mentioned above, are taken care. <br /> b)Height of the building at the current location: The proposed building is a two floor <br /> house. Currently, our house is a single floor house. So,this different in elevation might <br /> give the owners access to views over our property. However, we have considerations to <br /> build two floors in the future. Hence, the owner needs to mutually agree not to object to <br /> any future development in our property as far as the height and view are concerned, <br /> provided it complies with the City's height requirements. <br /> In previous FAST TRACK hearing, there was discussions about an alternative of moving <br /> the building laterally, behind our house. If there is a consideration of this alternative, such <br /> a move will bring a 27 ft building at 5 ft relative height from our house point of view, <br /> resulting in 31 ft. obstruction. Our house is at 381 ft from sea level while proposed <br /> building will sit at 385ft. This means <br /> - Our privacy will be severely impacted as the proposed building is a two storey <br /> building and it is very close to our property. It will be impossible to hide such a tall <br /> building with bushes when the building is close to our property line. <br /> - This tall building will obstruct the natural hill views that are available today at our <br /> backyard. <br /> Hence, we strongly object to this alternative and suggest other alternatives be considered. <br /> Views from our livin room the alternative discussed will im act the view <br /> c: <br />