My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3.1
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2008
>
September 4, 2008
>
Item 3.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 5:42:25 PM
Creation date
1/14/2015 3:27:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Staff Report
Date
2008-09-04
Item Number
Item 3.1
Description
Consideration of a Motion to Rescind Condition of Approval #27 Requiring the Dedication of a Pathway Easement on the Property; Lands of Burger; 11580 Old Ranch Road; File #12-08-ZP-SD-GD.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 3 <br />Los Altos Hills Pathway Committee DRAFT NOT REVIEWED BY PWC <br />Minutes of Meeting of August 25, 2008 <br />1. ADMINSTRATFVE <br />Chairman Ginger Summit called the meeting to order at 7:05 PM <br />Members present Jim Bliss, Courtenay Corrigan, Nick Dunckel, Nancy Gfnzton <br />Ginger Summit, Bill Silver, Bob Stutz, Jolon Wagner, Chris Vargas, <br />Sue Welch <br />Members absent: Anna Brunzell <br />Members of public present City Councilman Mike O'Malley <br />Debbie Pedro, Los Altos Hills Planning Director <br />Jim Abraham, Planning Commission? <br />John Burger, owner 11580 Old Ranch Road <br />Others (unrelated to this issue) <br />The agenda was approved as amended. <br />1. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE FLOOR <br />2. OLD BUSINESS <br />A. 11580 Old Ranch Road (Lands of Burger)_ Consideration of an amendment to the <br />recommendation for an off-road pathway easement on the property. This property was <br />reviewed by the PWC on February 25, 2008 and again on March 22, 2008. The Burgers were <br />present at the February meeting. The unanimous PWC recommendation at that time was to <br />maintain the existing equestrian easements along two sides of the property as pathway <br />easements. At that time, the PWC understood that this recently annexed part of Town had <br />not been reviewed for the 2005 Master Path Plan (MPP) and Town staff had indicated that <br />the equestrian easements in the Foothill Ranch subdivision could be dedicated to the Town <br />as pathway easements as the properties came up for development. <br />In its review, the Planning Commission argued that the Town could not require easements <br />for an off-road pathway on this property because these easements are not included on the <br />2005 MPP. At the request of the Planning Director, a Special Meeting of the PWC was held on <br />August 19, 2008 to review the PWC recommendation. At that meeting Debbie Pedro, LAH <br />Planning Director presented materials showing that the "Equestrian Rights of Way" in the <br />Foothill Ranch subdivision are private easements intended for use by people living in the <br />subdivision. These easements have not been formally dedicated to the Town. The property <br />owners, John and Catherine Burger, and a neighbor, Dave Namyst (Puffer way) expressed <br />the desire to keep these easement private. None of the easements in this area except the one <br />along the P.U.E. are shown on the MPP approved by Council in 2005. The PWC revisited the <br />area on Saturday, August 23. <br />At tonight's meeting, the PWC discussed the pros and cons of revising the original <br />recommendation in light of the additional information. It was generally agreed that this area <br />of Town has few pathways and that it would be desirable to provide paths off Ravensbury, <br />which is a busy, narrow road. The easements in Foothill Ranch subdivision, including those <br />on 11580 Old Ranch Road, could provide a connection to a nearby existing pathway along a <br />utility easement and allow pedestrians and equestrians to avoid Ravensbury. Alternate <br />routes involving on -road pathways along the wide streets in the area (e.g., Old Ranch Road <br />or Crestridge Drive) are also possible. These on -road routes have the advantage of requiring <br />easements on fewer properties. <br />DraftPWC_Min_o82508 (2).doc 8/28/o8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.