My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 7.1
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2008
>
September 4, 2008
>
Item 7.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 8:41:32 AM
Creation date
1/14/2015 3:58:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Staff Report
Date
2008-09-04
Item Number
Item 7.1
Description
July 17, 2008 Draft Meeting Minutes.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes DRAFT <br />July 17, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br />Commissioner Abraham commented that he felt that the reason for the large lightwells at the <br />basement level was to avoid counting the area in the MFA calculations. <br />Commissioner Collins asked why such a wide lightwell was needed. <br />Shad Shakralla said the proposed cut for the lightwell was to bring more light and a feeling of <br />openness to the back of the house. <br />Commissioner Clow asked why the garage was located on the south side of the house and not the <br />north side. The two heritage oak trees would not need to be removed if the garage was built on <br />the north side of the lot. Keeping the two oak trees would provide screening of the new <br />residence from the Cleary's home on Silent Hills Lane. <br />Shad Shakralla explained that locating the garage on the south side of the house made more <br />design sense. The new house would possibly be under the canopy of the two trees even if the <br />garage was not in that location. He felt that adequate screening could be provided at the time of <br />the landscape screening plan. <br />Commissioner Cottrell asked if the garage could be located closer to the landslide line. <br />Shad Shakralla felt that the geotechnical consultant would not be agreeable to moving the garage <br />closer to the landslide and the house could not be moved toward the front of the lot without <br />raising the height of the house. <br />Chairman Harpootlian asked staff if the inability to move the house because of the landslide <br />setback had been discussed previously. <br />Debbie Pedro said that the Town's geotechnical consultant had not commented on the potential <br />of moving the house within the landside setback. <br />Chairman Harpoothan asked about the use of the 500 square foot development area solar bonus <br />and effectiveness of the solar panels placed in the northwest location of the roof. <br />Shad Shakralla explained that the decision for the location of the panels had been made after a <br />neighbor on Julietta Lane had concerns over possible view of the solar panels from their <br />property. The solar panels were moved to accommodate the neighbor. <br />Commissioner Abraham stated that solar panels installed in that location would not function <br />well. <br />Chairman Harpoothan said that there must be a location on the roof for the solar panels to be <br />installed where the sun would shine on them. <br />Commissioner Abraham asked the reason why the garage was changed from the previous <br />location in the basement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.