Laserfiche WebLink
Fritz & Cathy Mueller <br /> <br />Los Altos Hills <br />RECEIVED <br />Planning Commission, Town of Los Altos Hills TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS <br />9/1/06 <br />Dear Members of the Planning Commission: <br />We are writing to urge the Planning Commission to reject the site development <br />permit for the proposed cell phone antenna at 26410 Duval Way. Our reason for <br />objecting to this permit is that Duval Way already has 4 cell phone antenna <br />installed on 3 poles. The close proximity of all these antenna to our property is <br />detrimental to property values. It is an accepted fact that everyone wants cell <br />phone coverage from their house but we would contend that nobody wants to live <br />next to the maximum number of antenna possible. In the rase of Duval Way, we <br />are unfairly burdened by these antennas. The following points summarize my <br />reasons: <br />• The residents of Duval Way don't benefit from more antenna, we already <br />have 4 other cellular services to choose from and don't need a fifth next to our <br />house. <br />• Anyone within range of Duval Way also has the same 4 cellular services to <br />choose from. <br />• We learned at a recent planning commission meeting that once an antenna is <br />installed H remains FOREVER and there is nothing the residents or town can <br />do unless the phone company wants to remove the antenna. This was the <br />position presented by the town staff. This means that any decision made on <br />this issue must be considered as permanent, not subject to the time limits of <br />the permit <br />• This antenna is intended for the benefit of the phone company first and <br />foremost. If the residents interests were important then the phone company <br />would accept moving the antenna to another location that might be less <br />optimal but still provides coverage without further burdening Duval Way. <br />• The church site is a single lot surrounded by residential lots. It is being turned <br />into an industrial facility that I don't think is consistent with its surroundings. <br />Unfortunately this is not a win-win situation. The first one or two antennas in our <br />neighborhood could be considered win-win because the phone companies got <br />the location they wanted and the residents got excellent cell phone coverage <br />from their home. Now that we are looking at a fifth and possibly sixth antenna <br />(the AT&T proposal has a provision for an additional carrier) it has become a win - <br />lose scenario. You are being asked to choose between fellow residents and the <br />phone company and I urge you to side with the residents and ask the phone <br />