Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />VARIANCE AND PERMIT COMMISSION <br />` Town of Los Altos Hills <br />26379 Fremont Road <br />Los Altos Hills, California <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING <br />Wednesday, February 8, 1978 <br />Reel 66, Side 2, Tr.2, 183 to 441 <br />Chairman Dochnahl called the meeting of the Variance and Permit Commission to <br />order at 6:37 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Town Hall. <br />ROLL CALL: <br />Present: Commissioners Dochnahl, VanTamelen and Perkins <br />Also Present: Town Planner/Engineer John Markl, Secretary Ethel Hopkins <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of November 30, 1977 <br />Since former Variance and Permit Commission member Stewart had indicated in writing <br />his approval of the November 30 Minutes, it was proposed by Commissioner Dochnahl <br />and the consensus of the Commissioners present that the Minutes be approved as written. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS: <br />1. LANDSOF EVANS, File #VAR. 7048-77, 26475 Anacapa Drive, Paul Nowack & Associates, <br />nc., ng neer, equest or Variance in Setback to Construct a Garage and Carport <br />Town Planner/Engineer Markl discussed pertinent information on the above request <br />as contained in his staff report dated January 30, 1978, noting that the applicant <br />wished to obtain a variance from the setback requirements in order to construct <br />a garage. He recommended visual screening to obscure the area from street view. <br />Commissioners asked questions on whether the applicant had considered extending <br />his house on the southwesterly side so that the garage could be accommodated within <br />the setback area, whether an adequate turn around space would be provided, and <br />whether the applicant could do without a garage. The hearing was opened to the public. <br />Howard EvansA licant,stated that his reasons for requesting a variance were set <br />ou in s orig na app ication. He discussed the several alternative plans sub- <br />mitted, noting that Alternative A was not acceptable because the setback limit <br />was at the edge of the house and the back yard dropped off very quickly, while <br />Alternative B was not desirable because it would gut into the side of the house. <br />It was noted that the site could accommodate off-street parking, and that the <br />garage should be limited to one story since the house was a one-story house. The <br />six reasons for granting a variance were reviewed, and the following motions passed. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY PASSED: It was moved by Commissioner VanTamelen, <br />[ seconded by Commissioner Perkins and unanimously approved that a condition be added <br />to the effect that: The garage addition shall be limited to a single story. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND UNANIMOUSLY PASSED: It was moved by Commissioner Perkins, <br />