Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Town of Los Altos Hills <br />27379 Fremont Road <br />Los Altos Hills, California <br />MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING <br />Wednesday, February 27, 1980 <br />Reel 83, Side 2, Tr. 2, 876 to End; Reel 84, Side 1, Tr. 2, 001 to End; Side 2, Tr. 2, <br />001 to 065 <br />Chairman VanTamelen called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order in the <br />Council Chambers of the Town Hall at 7:47 p.m. <br />ROLL CALL: <br />Present: Commissioners Carico, Lachenbruch, Stewart, Dochnahl, Kuranoff, vanTamelen <br />Absent: Commissioner Rydell <br />Also Present: City Planner/Engineer John Carlson, Assistant Planner Pat Webb, <br />Secretary Ethel Hopkins <br />CONSENT CALENDAR: <br />The Minutes of February 13 were removed from the Consent Calendar for separate con- <br />sideration. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY: On the motion of Commissioner Stewart seconded <br />by Commissioner Dochnahl the balance of the Consent Calendar was approved, namely the <br />followina: <br />1. Variance and Permit Commission Public Hearin gg for March 12: Lands of Cheng, <br />File #VAR. 2-80 (formerly File #VAR. 7067-80) <br />2. Planning Comission Public Hearings for March 12: Proposed Amendments to <br />Los Altos Hills Municipal Code Sections 9-4.703, 9-4.704 (Subsections (a) <br />and (b), 9-4.707, 9-4.710, 9-5.208(1), 9-5.209, 9-5.502, and 9-5.503 (Sub- <br />section (a). <br />The Minutes of February 13 were corrected as follows: (1) On page three, Condition 6.A <br />was amended to read: A Type IA native path shall be installed within the pedestrian <br />and equestrian easement on Lots 8 and 9. (2) Commissioner Lachenbruch requested that the <br />following remark be added to Condition 10.A: Commissioner Lachenbruch suggested that the <br />applicant might consider naming the street in honor of Mr. Molinari who lived on the <br />property for many years and who died just this month. <br />Carol Gottlieb, Pathway Committee, questioned whether the bridges referred to in Con- <br />dition 6.B s ou d be ui t at Town expense and whether two or three bridges would be <br />built. <br />Considerable discussion occurred on what had been recommended by the Planning Commission <br />with regard to the number of bridges to be built and who should pay for them. The con- <br />sensus was, however, that the minutes were correct as recorded. The Commission suggested <br />that both the Council representative and the City Engineer impress upon the City Council <br />that the two bridges recommended were important bridges and were to be installed at the <br />time of the subdivision improvements installation. The Commission advised Mrs. Gottlieb <br />to take her requests that the subdivider pay for and construct the bridges to the <br />City Council. <br />