Laserfiche WebLink
%W Susan Roberts, Giuliani & Kull, the applicant's civil engineer, commented that they were <br />attempting to achieve a suitable project using the area they had to work with. She was asking for <br />input from the City Council on possible allowable deviations from the grading criteria. <br />Hubbard stated that he believed Council had made it perfectly clear at the earlier Council <br />Meeting on this application that the siting of the house on the upper lot would have a detrimental <br />impact on that area of Town and the driveway issues could not be resolved to be consistent with <br />Town standards. In addition the proposed driveway design was not acceptable to both the City <br />Engineer and the City Planner. Dauber, Johnson and Siegel concurred with Hubbad's <br />comments. Casey referred to 1989 when this subdivision was originally approved. She noted <br />that the driveway had been discussed at length at that time and the intention had been clear to <br />approve the building site at the top lot. She supported the Kerns' project and did not believe it <br />was right to approve a lot and then change that decision. <br />k1w,"al:01 AN 11610.2 01013VAUL&W816" <br />Liz Dana, member - Environmental Design and Protection Committee, stated that she was <br />against building this house on the ridgeline. <br />4. ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no farther new or old business to discuss, the City Council Meeting was <br />adjourned at 5:50 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Patricia Dowd <br />City Clerk <br />The minutes of the April 1, 1998 Adjourned Regular City Council Meeting were <br />approved at the April 15, 1998 City Council Meeting. <br />%W <br />April 1, 1998 <br />Adjourned City Council Meeting <br />