Laserfiche WebLink
changed to the November Meeting; and Page 7, last paragraph, second sentence should read: <br />"She did not think these conditions were wise or necessary because cars turning right had no <br />�kv convenient way to make a u -tum and the fact that approaching cars would have just made a full <br />stop a few feet before the driveway." <br />AYES: Mayor Casey and Councilmembers Dauber, Johnson and Siegel <br />NOES: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilmember Hubbard (not present at the 3/4/98 Council Meeting) <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />5.1 Uniform Building Code Requirements for Basements <br />The Planning Director referred to the Town's current Zoning Code on basements: "Basement <br />shall mean a space wholly underground and having its entire height measured from its floor to its <br />ceiling below the adjoining grade, except for required exits. Exits shall only be allowed from <br />basements as required by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and must be windows or doors that <br />are not visible from off-site." Compliance with the minimum UBC requirements for basements <br />generally meant providing at least one exit from a basement (unless it was for storage or utility <br />use only) and providing light wells which comprised 10% of the floor area of the basement. The <br />Planning Director noted that staff attempted to apply these criteria to each basement, as well as <br />assuring that the basement ceiling was below the adjoining grade and that the doors and windows <br />were not visible from off-site. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Dauber and passed by <br />the following roll call vote to accept the April 1, 1998 staff report on uniform building code <br />requirements for basements. <br />�Mr AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Johnson and Councilmembers Dauber, Hubbard and Siegel <br />NOES: Mayor Casey <br />�W <br />Casey stated that no input from residents had been requested or received on the issue of <br />basements. <br />5.2 Fire Vehicle Turnarounds in Setbacks <br />The Planning Director referred to the following section of the Code: "No structure, nor portion <br />thereof, other than driveways, including necessary backup areas; walkways; minor ornamental <br />garden structures ... shall be constructed, altered, or maintained so as to be located between the <br />property line and any setback line, except as otherwise permitted by the provisions of this <br />chapter." The issue raised was a clarification of whether turnaround area required by the Fire <br />Department was considered a "backup area" and therefore permitted in setbacks. The Planning <br />Director noted that staff had treated fire vehicle turnaround areas similar to backup areas in terms <br />of setbacks, as it was often difficult to distinguish them. If the vehicle turnaround was proposed <br />in excess of the vehicle backup area and was to be located in the setback, then it would be <br />appropriate to require surfacing that would reduce the hardscape appearance. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Casey, seconded by Hubbard and passed <br />unanimously to direct staff to bring an ordinance back to Council mending the Zoning Code to <br />reflect the currently used interpretation of fire vehicle turnarounds in setbacks as specifically <br />outlined in the April 1, 1998 staff report on fire vehicle tumarounds in setbacks. <br />April 1, 1998 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />