City Council Minutes
4/20/2016 12:25:39 PM
5/21/2015 4:21:22 PM
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
All rights reserved.
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View plain text
%W 4.1 Approval of Minutes: January 15, 1997 (Regular Meeting) <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson and <br />passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 15, 1997 City Council <br />Meeting with the following corrections: Page 3, Item 4.8, change the word "owner" to <br />"neighbor"; Page 7, Item 9.2, change the last sentence to read: "No policy change was <br />made on these issues."; and Page 10, third paragragh, amend Siegel's comments to read: <br />"Siegel referred to the drainage problems on La Paloma and the value of wide <br />easements to enhance the openness of the Town. Other lots on La Paloma had <br />dedicated a 30 foot half -street." <br />4.1 Approval of Minutes: January 29,1997 (Adjourned Regular Meeting) <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson and <br />passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the January 29,1997 Adjourned Regular <br />Meeting with the following correction: Page 3, first paragraph, 2) should read: "identify <br />why changes to projects were made and make this quite clear to the applicants so they <br />understood why their development area, floor area, etc. was reduced". <br />4.3 Rejection of Claim: Casey Construction <br />Casey asked if the claimant had been notified of this meeting and was advised that he <br />had. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Dauber and <br />passed unanimously to reject the claim from Casey Construction. <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB -COMMITTEES, AND <br />COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES <br />7.1 Subcommittee on amendments to Master Path Plan — Recommended <br />Procedure for Review of Master Path Plan <br />Council discussed the recommended procedure for review of the Master Path Plan. <br />This procedure stated: 1) The Pathway Committee should review the 1981 Master Path <br />Plan Map section by section and submit their recommendation to the Council showing <br />existing off-road paths and additions and deletions of future off-road paths.; 2) The <br />Council reviews the recommendation and can approve or modify them, and 3) The <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />February 5, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.