Laserfiche WebLink
Mrs. Griffiths, 13630 Roble Alto Court, supported the policy in concept but believed such a <br />policy needed input from lighting experts. She questioned how `safety' was defined and did not <br />believe the present policy provided for adequate lighting. She commented that she had received <br />the flyer just the day before but she had been glad to get it. <br />Betty Ng, 12700 Leander Drive, believed the Town was creating a bureaucracy. She saw no <br />reason why the Town should regulate the wattage of bulbs when the neighbors could work out <br />lighting issues amongst themselves. <br />Donald Rutherford, 25551 Burke Lane, believed residents should be able to choose their own <br />lighting on their property. <br />Tom LeFevre, 14850 Manuella Road, stated that he was a member of the Los Altos Hills Civic <br />Association which included about sixty members and was established as a subcommittee for <br />social and communication issues. Their goals were to 1) encourage friendship amoung residents; <br />2) inform residents of issues; and 3) encourage residents to get involved in Town government. <br />The association had sent out the flyer encouraging residents to attend this meeting and as they <br />got more organized the mailings would be done in a more timely manner. Concerning the <br />policy, he thought there was a difference between what lighting was safe and what lighting did <br />not offend neighbors. He also did not believe the policy allowed residents to enjoy and use their <br />outdoor living spaces. <br />William Evans, 13334 La Cresta Drive, suggested the Town was working too hard on this policy. <br />Such detail was not needed and was difficult to implement. As it was, holiday lights would not <br />be allowed. He believed aesthetics were important as well as safety. <br />%hr Jim Abraham, 12831 Viscaino Road, recommended writing a new lighting ordinance which <br />addressed the needs of the Town. <br />Dot Schreiner and Carol Gottlieb, Planning Commissioners, noted that the Planning Commission <br />was encountering more lighting problems as the larger homes were coming in for review. When <br />the homes were 7-10,000 square feet, the first and second floors were lit, the trees were lit and <br />there were skylights, the cumulative effect of the lighting could have quite an impact on the <br />neighbors. The proposed policy was the Town's effort to control some of these situations. <br />Mrs. Sheene, 12376 Purissima Lane, appreciated receiving the notice about this meeting. She <br />believed residents paid a lot of money for their homes and should have the freedom to put in the <br />lighting they want. There apparently had been so few complaints, the Town should let the <br />neighbors work out any problems. <br />Mr. Kwok, 26837 Purissima Road, commented that both sides had valid points. He believed <br />different family situations resulted in different lighting needs, i.e. homes with children needed <br />more light. <br />Lalla Carsten, member, Los Altos Hills Civic Association, believed the residents wanted to know <br />more about Town issues such as lighting and she hoped the Town would give more notice of <br />such discussions. She did not think that the residents needed any more restrictions. <br />Charles Wiseman, 26666 Birch Hill Way, recommended that there be a committee formed that <br />would hear appeals of lighting problems. <br />July 16, 1997 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />