Laserfiche WebLink
The City Manager noted that the parcel data base system was intended to become the <br />primary source of the private property and street right of way information. To <br />achieve this goal, staff and the Technology Improvement Committee had held <br />several meetings and the recommendations included purchasing LandTech Parcel <br />Data Base system software and converting to a PC based platform. The City Manager <br />further commented on the training involved and the impact on staff. <br />Council agreed that it was beneficial to not change everyone over to PCs at once <br />thereby allowing for a gradual training process. They also asked for clarification of <br />the technical services contract (a service contract on something that should work?) <br />and staff was directed to find out what the Town of Woodside did regarding this <br />issue. Council also inquired about the value of the three year warranty. Council <br />recommended faxes at the workstations, clarification of the number of workstations <br />and the installation of a generous amount of memory. <br />MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Hubbard <br />and passed unanimously to approve the purchase of the LandTech Parcel Data Base <br />system, to approve a budget of $59,000 for this project and to direct staff to request <br />proposals for the purchase of the computer hardware. <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />6.1 Report on Survey concerning Bullis School Auditorium Project <br />Mary Hinckley, representing the Gymnasium/ Auditorium Committee, reported <br />that of 279 responses, 164 were for the project and 110 were against, with 5 uncertain. <br />She commented that while there was great enthusiasm on the part of some, there <br />was also serious opposition. Mrs. Hinckley noted that they decided not to pursue <br />the project at this time. <br />6.2 Report on Home Computer Survey <br />William Johnson, member of the Technology Improvement Committee, referred to <br />the report he had prepared for Council on the home computer survey. He noted <br />that the response rate was 14% which in his opinion was high. Only 7% said thev <br />had no computers at home; the type of computers was almost equally divided <br />between Apple and IBM; most residents were connected with modems to Internet, <br />CompuServe, their companies, etc.; and over 80% said they would occasionally or <br />frequently contact Town Hall for information. <br />Council thanked Mr. Johnson for his report. Johnson suggested an article be put in <br />the next newsletter reporting on the results of this survey. Dauber and Siegel <br />commented that this computer contact with Town Hall for information could be <br />extremely time consuming for staff and cautioned that the impact on staff should be <br />January 17, 1996 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />