My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/21/1995
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1995
>
06/21/1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 1:15:32 PM
Creation date
5/27/2015 9:47:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1995-06-21
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br />adopt one now. Mrs. Stutz also referred to the Town's Master Pathway Plan which <br />was adopted in 1982. She further commented on the repair and washout of <br />paths noting that Type IIB paths were much more affected than native paths. <br />Mrs. Stutz believed this was due to the Town no longer using neary fines for <br />the paths. <br />Les Earnest, Chairman of the Pathways Committee, explained the committee's slope <br />standard recommendation as a method to reduce erosion. He also commented <br />on the useability of paths. On the subject of the Master Path Plan, he noted that <br />some of the paths on this plan were impractical and needed to be deleted. They <br />planned to review the Master Path Plan. <br />Siegel believed that the Town had to start asking some more precise questions <br />concerning paths such as "Is a path possible?" and this standard was a step in <br />that direction. Hubbard did not agree with the proposed slope standard. He <br />thought the Town had a great path system and it was possible an applicant <br />could use this standard as a reason not to give a path. On the subject of erosion, <br />he noted that water bars could be used. <br />Carol Gottlieb, 24290 Summerhill, believed that the concept of a slope standard was <br />`, good but there were many ramifications which needed to be addressed. She <br />thought it possible that a 10% slope standard could be used in a large <br />subdivision. <br />Bob Stutz, 25310 Elena, noted that the new paths were not in as good condition as <br />the old paths and perhaps the whole concept of surfacing should be addressed. <br />He referred to the State Recreational Trails Committee as a group having some <br />ideas on this issue the Town might want to consider. Mr. Stutz did not agree <br />with a 10% slope standard. <br />Council commented that more review of this issue was needed and no action was <br />taken on this matter at this time. <br />7.2 Composting Subcommittee: final report and completion of subcommittee <br />Council accepted the final report of the composting subcommittee and closed this <br />subcommittee. <br />7.3 Development Area Subcommittee: completion of subcommittee <br />June 21, 1995 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.