Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />John Vidovich, applicant, addressed the Council concerning this lot line <br />adjustment. He commented that this was the proposed lot for his home and he was <br />hoping to be able to move forward with this project. He did request that the lot line <br />adjustment be allowed to go forward with the understanding that annexation or <br />deannexation of the land under discussion take place later. <br />PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To approve the proposed lot line adjustment for Lands <br />of Wise at 24301 Elise Court and Lands of Vidovich, Santa Clara County subject to a <br />conservation easement or other restriction on the property preventing further <br />development on the portion of Lands of Wise (0.62 acre) until this property is <br />deannexed to the County. <br />6.2 Status of Vidovich Applications with Santa Clara County <br />Council had before them the Planning Director's 7/19/95 report on the Vidovich <br />applications, including the lot line adjustment with Lands of Wise and the plans for <br />his home. The report included the information that concerning the lot line <br />adjustment the County was waiting for the Council's action and also clarification <br />from the applicant on the exact lot line adjustment to be addressed. The County <br />would request a copy of the Town -approved lot line adjustment plan from Mr. <br />Vidovich. Regarding the house plans, these would be going through the County <br />not the Town as the land was not in the Town's Urban Service Area. However, the <br />County would be forwarding the plans to the Town for comment. Concerning the <br />Quarry Subdivision Project, the Planning Director noted that if the necessary <br />information was received from Mr. Vidovich within a couple of weeks, it was <br />possible the project could be heard by the Planning Commission in September. <br />Hubbard believed the house and the subdivision were related in such matters as <br />access roads, etc. and he thought both applications should be discussed at the same <br />time. Siegel noted that there were still several issues that needed to be resolved <br />between the County and the Town. Casey commented on the septic vs. sewer issue <br />and questioned mandating sewer systems. She asked that this topic be agendized for <br />a future Council Meeting. Casey also asked if the Town had a policy discouraging <br />large lots, such as Mr. Vidovich's lot for his home, and was advised that the Town <br />had no such policy. <br />7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUB -COMMITTEES. AND <br />COUNCILMEMBERS ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES <br />8. STAFF REPORTS <br />8.1 City Manager <br />July 19, 1995 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />