10/17/1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Dauber, seconded by Johnson and passed by the following roll call vote to approve the request for a site development permit for a new residence for Lands of Chan at 14295 Saddle Mountain Drive, subject to the Conditions of Approval as recommended by the Planning Commission and amended by Council in part to reflect the lowering of the peak of the entry tower element by six feet as compared to the plans (dated 9/16/94) approved by the Planning Commission at their 9/14/94 Commisssion Meeting and to reflect that the top of the modified tower element will not be used as a decking area. AYES: Mayor Dauber and Councilmembers Hubbard and Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Siegel ABSTAIN: Councilmember Tryon Tryon noted that due to a family emergency she had arrived late to the meeting and had not been present for all of the discussion on this application. For this reason she abstained from the vote but she did commend the neighbors for working together toward a solution. 11.2 Request for review of a Site Development Permit Condition to dedicate additional right-of-way on the cul-de-sac, Lands of Belden, 12033 Green Hills Court The City Attorney noted that the City Council did not have the authority to allow an amount of right of way less than that required in the Town's Code or Policy. The public hearing on the Lands of Belden as well as the Lands of Corrigan should be continued to allow Council the opportunity to amend the right of way policy or to allow the applicants to apply for a variance. Council had before them the Planning Director's staff report dated 10/17/94 which included the following recommendation: direct staff to re -review the cul-de-sac ordinance for making it consistent with the right-of-way policy and direct staff to combine the right of way policy and cul-de-sac ordinance into one ordinance and bring it back to Council. Peter Duxbury, applicant's architect, referred to the cul-de-sac under discussion and the impact this condition has on his client's application. Lee Belden, applicant, noted that this dedication makes his lot non -conforming by a very small amount. He was concerned about the financial implications of proceeding with this application and asked for more time to review the issue. He noted that he would not be willing to complete the dedication paperwork at this time but not have it recorded until a later date. 4 October 17, 1994 l Adjourned Regular Meeting