My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/20/1993 (2)
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1993
>
01/20/1993 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 12:20:26 PM
Creation date
5/28/2015 10:52:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1993-01-20
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
`, 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />5.1 Request for a Site Development Permit for a new residence, pool and <br />spa, Lands of Viso, 28620 Matadero Creek Court <br />Bob Owen, applicant's contractor, noted that this issue had been discussed at the <br />previous Council Meeting and he believed they had complied with Council's <br />direction of reducing the proposed development area on the project. He noted that <br />his client did not want to reduce the size of the house but had agreed to <br />modifications in the overall development such as reducing the coverage of the <br />parking area and providing for additional planting areas. <br />Dauber believed that more outdoor living area was needed for this lot and proposed <br />two conditions be added to those recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />These conditions were: 1) require a recorded restriction notifying future owners that <br />there was a specific limited amount of development remaining on this lot; and 2) <br />require a landscape plan prior to the building permit being issued. <br />Bob Owen, applicant's contractor, responded that it took time to do a landscaping <br />plan and if there was a break in the weather they would like to proceed with the <br />project. <br />`. Frank Clohan, applicant's attorney, referred to the disclosure laws which were quite <br />specific and had to be complied with and also noted that his client was in <br />conformance with all of the Town's ordinances. He believed this project should be <br />approved. <br />Jim Viso, applicant, gave a brief history of this project and noted how he had spent a <br />lot of time and money on modifying his project to comply with the Town's <br />ordinances. He did not agree with Councilmember Dauber's proposed conditions <br />and believed his application should be treated fairly since it was in conformance <br />with the Town's regulations. <br />Hubbard did not support these proposed conditions and thought they were an <br />attempt to micromanage this project. Regarding the recorded restrictions on the <br />project, he believed there were safeguards built into the system and supported only <br />recording such restrictions in the case of extraordinary circumstances. Siegel <br />supported Dauber's proposed conditions, noting that this project was built out to all <br />limits of development. Johnson commented that he could not find a legal reason to <br />object to this project. The staff recommended approval and he believed the issues <br />had been addressed. <br />January 20, 1993 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.