03/18/1992 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Item Removed: 4.1 Approval of Minutes: March 4, 1992 Casey referred to page seven and stated that the reference to her comments should state that she believed a raise in the Council's salary could be justified and would be allowed by State Law but she also believed that the salary, whether it was $250 or $300, should include all expenses incurred. Tryon did not recall this statement as being accurate. She believed Casey stated that she supported a $300 increase or no increase at all. PASSED BY CONSENSUS: To continue the minutes of the March 4, 1992 City Council Meeting to the next meeting to allow time for the tape of the meeting to be listened to and to also include the following correction: page 5, second paragraph should read: "Tryon asked the applicants and their developer to work with the neighbors and also requested that they lower the pitch of the roof and extend the eaves." 5. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR Shari Emling, 11853 Murietta Lane, referred to the candidate statement prepared by Councilmember Casey and stated that the following two statements were not true: I) initiated the 1989 resident survey and 2) had Council agendas published in the kir Town Crier. Mrs. Emling noted that she had friends who had worked on the survey in 1988 and she had a clipping from a 1984 Town Crier which listed Council agenda items. She believed these statements should not be made to the voters since they were not correct and she believed the statement should be corrected. Casey responded that she had been on the Council in 1989 when the consultant was brought on to do the survey and when she started her term of office in 1988 the agendas were not published in the Town Crier. The City Attorney noted that there was a ten-day period for examination by the public of candidate's statements. Any resident had until March 27th to file a writ of mandate with the court if they believed a candidate's statement should be corrected before going in the sample ballot. John Glathe, 13801 LaPaloma, commented on the Lands of Cheng on La Paloma and the tearing down of a barn and the approval of a tennis court and chain link fence. He believed this was an encroachment into the open space of LaPaloma. Dot Schreiner, Chairman - Pathways, Recreation and Parks Committee, noted that she was present at the Cheng Site Development Meeting and she believed the kir March 18, 1992 Regular Meeting 3