10/21/1992 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Items Removed: 4.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 16,1992 Dauber requested that the following wording be clarified concerning the discussion on the pathway. Page 2,line 8: "The question was raised of an easement to be granted..." should read "The question was raised of a pathway easement that was requested to be granted ..." Page 2, line 12: "...was getting a dedication of the future pathway ..." should read: "was getting a dedication of a future offroad pathway ..."Page 2,line 15: "...question about why the small part of the path..." should read "...question about why the offroad portion of the path..." Page 2, last sentence,first paragraph: "The condition was also added that the driveway to provide access to the other lot would not extend past approximately 150 yards thereby making the property not further subdividable" should read "The condition was also added that there would be an easement on the driveway to provide access to the other lot,but that the easement would not extend further than 150 yards." MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED—Moved by Johnson, seconded by Dauber, and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the Minutes of September 16, 1992 as amended. 4.1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 7,1992 Dauber requested that the following wording be changed: Page 5,last paragraph reads "Mrs. Penny' and should read "Mrs.,Phinney." Page 7,first paragraph following vote: "It was also agreed that staff would bring the recalculated maximum floor area and maximum development area numbers back to the Council if there was a problem and staff would also research the Simonds pathway dedication" should read "It was also agreed that staff would bring back the maximum floor area and maximum development area numbers recalculated as a result of the required dedications." Page 7, item 6.3, paragraph 2, last sentence: "...Mr. Packard would give his son an easement" should read "...Mr. Packard's son would give him an easement." On the same item in the following paragraph: "...studied the driveway and determine there was a safe site distance" should read: "...studied the driveway and determined that a safe site distance could be achieved." Page 8,line 3 reads: "Dauber noted that the floor area had not been reduced on the other lots on La Paloma (such as the Nelsons)..." should read: "Dauber noted that the floor area had not been reduced on the other lots on La Paloma due to increased setbacks (such as the Nelsons) ..." OCTOBER 21, 1992 -3-