Laserfiche WebLink
( person's property if the secondary dwelling is near a property line. Mrs. <br /> ♦r Munoz also expressed her concerns about building out on a property and <br /> noted the importance of fairness. <br /> Betsy Bertram, 11854 Page Mill Road, asked if a change in the footprint or <br /> roofing of a secondary unit required site development and was advised <br /> that it did. She also supported the recommendations made by the <br /> Planning Commission. She did not agree with the policy that if a <br /> nonconforming structure was destroyed it could be rebuilt as it was even if <br /> that was in violation of the Town's ordinances. <br /> Hubbard commented that the Rebuilding/Building Out Subcommittee had not <br /> recommended such changes and had not discussed secondary dwellings. <br /> Shari Emling, 11853 Murietta Lane, recommended that the Council cover all <br /> the bases and use careful wording; the ordinances need to have integrity. <br /> Max Brown, 12670 Dianne Drive, supported the ordinance changes. He was not <br /> aware that units could be rented and expressed concern about what actions <br /> could take place on properties in Town. <br /> Bill Avalini, 26640 Purissima Road and Sue Tang, 26638 Purissima Road, stated <br /> that they were concerned about the Wheatley application and supported <br /> �r the ordinance changes. <br /> Ed Hager, 26656 Purissima, supported changes in ordinance and noted that they <br /> as well as many of their neighbors could conceivably change their barns to <br /> secondary dwellings. <br /> Mr. Wheatley, 26644 Purissima, believed it was unfair that his application was <br /> being discussed during this meeting but was not officially on the agenda. <br /> He objected to his being given direction by staff and then having the <br /> project objected to. He believed he was in line with the Town's ordinances <br /> and was willing to mitigate problems. Regarding the urgency ordinance <br /> Mr. Wheatley stated that if this were adopted, he would be deprived of <br /> what he could do on his property. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by Tryon <br /> and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the following <br /> changes to the proposed ordinance: Section 10-1.401 Nonconforming <br /> Structures: " . . .result in an increase in the nonconformity nor change of <br /> use."; Section 10-1.406 Nonconforming Uses: Maintenance: " . . .however, <br /> no structural alterations nor change of use."; Section 10-1.405, change act of <br /> God to Act of God; and Section 10-1.406, amend to read as follows: " . . . .as <br /> 411/ <br /> April 3, 1991 <br /> 7 <br />