Laserfiche WebLink
Susan Olson, 26020 Elena, commented that she believed it was dangerous to <br /> have access on Elena at the proposed point. <br /> Mrs. Sun, 12444 Robleda, raised several concerns about the requested <br /> encroachment permit including the following: the reason for the <br /> encroachment permit was groundless; it endangered public traffic safety; it <br /> destroyed existing scenic landscape; it violated a court order; the permit <br /> application did not satisfy encroachment permit procedure and was <br /> inconsistent with an existing permit. She referred to her June 12th letter <br /> to the Town on this subject which included a petition which had been <br /> signed by several neighbors against the encroachment permit. Mrs. Sun <br /> also objected to Mr. Nissley's last minute presentation of plans. <br /> A discussion followed on the width of Mrs Sun's driveway and concerns were <br /> expressed as to why driveway appeared to be 9'8" wide and not the 12' <br /> width approved by Council. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon <br /> and passed unanimously to continue Mr. Nissley's request for an <br /> encroachment permit to the next Council meeting and to investigate why <br /> the Sun's driveway was not the approved 12' width. <br /> 8.2 Resolution Granting Extension for Completion and Certification <br /> of EIR for Lands of Eshner <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon <br /> and passed unanimously to adopt Resolution #32-91 extending the one <br /> year time limit for preparation and certification of an EIR for Lands of <br /> Eshner. <br /> 8.3 Request for Annexation of Lands of Anderson, 25225 La Loma Drive <br /> Mayor Hubbard stepped down from consideration of this item as he was a <br /> neighbor. <br /> Council had before them the Planning Consultant's staff report which included <br /> the recommendation that Council request annexation of the Anderson <br /> property and other properties along La Loma Drive prior to development. <br /> Mr. Anderson, 25225 La Loma Drive, stated that he and his wife did not want to <br /> annex to the Town nor did their neighbors. In addition to it not being <br /> their preference to annex, it would cause them severe delays in their <br /> building timetable with the County. <br /> kir <br /> June 19, 1991 <br /> 11 <br />