My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/04/1991 (2)
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1991
>
09/04/1991 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2015 3:36:25 PM
Creation date
6/1/2015 3:13:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1991-09-04
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Delos Circle, applicant, addressed the following issues concerning his <br /> proposed subdivision: size of house, lot stability, setbacks, visual impact, <br /> excess runoff, fault, slope and environmental checklist. <br /> Carol Crawford, 13023 Vista del Valle, stated her belief that the proposed <br /> subdivision was contrary to the Town's General Plan. She also noted that <br /> staff and the Planning Commission had recommended denial and she <br /> supported their recommendations. <br /> Terry Gossett, 26600 Elena, reiterated his concerns about drainage, effluence and <br /> earth slides. He noted that he had met with Mr. Circle and Mr. Nowack <br /> and while the new drainage plan was an improvement, he still had <br /> concerns. <br /> Glen Fuller, 12989 Vista del Valle, believed this was a very constrained building <br /> site and had concerns about drainage, stability, visual impact and slope. <br /> He also believed the proposed development was in conflict with the <br /> General Plan. <br /> William Sullivan, 26531 Taaffe Road, concurred with Mr. Fuller's comments <br /> and stated that he believed it was an issue of judgement and not just <br /> numbers. <br /> Tryon commented on the constraints of this lot and the drainage and density <br /> issues. She noted that there could be a secondary dwelling of 1,000 square <br /> feet or there could be additional conditions imposed such as single story, <br /> smaller house, no secondary dwelling. Siegel noted that the applicant did <br /> not need a subdivision for a secondary dwelling and he also noted that <br /> numbers for these lots were figured right to the limit with lot unit factors <br /> of 1.1 and 1.0. Johnson stated his two concerns. First that it was not <br /> appropriate to have a leach field in a conservation easement and secondly <br /> that the proposed development conflicted with the Town's General Plan <br /> and the Government Code. Casey stated that the proposed development <br /> just met the Town's requirements but it did meet them. She believed it <br /> was an issue of fairness but also noted that the size of the house should be <br /> limited. She suggested a meeting with Mr. Circle, staff and the neighbors <br /> to reach a proposal which addressed everyone's concerns. <br /> Paul Nowack, applicant's engineer, commented on the location of the leach <br /> field and noted that this had been approved by the Town Geologist and the <br /> Health Department. He also stated that the Town's Code did not preclude <br /> structures in conservation easements but Council did have to approve <br /> them. <br /> September 4, 1991 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.