Laserfiche WebLink
hi/ Casey urged that Planning Commissioners be present at the December 18th meeting <br /> as their input on this project was important. <br /> 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> 6.1 Request for Approval of a Conditional Exception and Approval of a <br /> Tentative Map for a Two-Lot Subdivision, Lands of Merrill, 25355 <br /> La Loma Drive <br /> This public hearing has been continued at the request of the applicant. <br /> Mr. Richard Aurelio, 25320 La Loma Drive, stated that he had a basic objection <br /> to the continual continuation of this hearing and he believed it was a <br /> tactic to wear the neighbors down. He had cancelled a business trip to <br /> Boston to attend this meeting and was not pleased that it was continued <br /> again. In addition he strongly objected to the granting of a variance for <br /> economic gain which is what he believed this application was for. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Tryon <br /> and passed unanimously to continue the public hearing on the request for <br /> approval of a conditional exception and approval of a tentative map for a <br /> two-lot subdivision for Lands of Merrill at 25355 La Loma Drive to the <br /> ktiv December 18th Council Meeting and to request the Mayor to send a letter <br /> to Mr. Merrill stating the Council's concerns about the continuation of this <br /> application and to state that the Council will not necessarily honor <br /> another request for a continuance. <br /> 6.2 Request for a Variance to the Fence Height/Setback Requirements of <br /> the Zoning Code, Lands of Forward, 10575 Blandor Way <br /> Council had before them the Director of Public Works staff report dated <br /> 11/20/91 which noted that this request had been denied by the Planning <br /> Commission as they had been unable to make the variance findings for <br /> hardship but they had requested that the matter be placed before the City <br /> Council. <br /> Dr. Terry Forward, applicant, explained her request for a fence which included <br /> safety reasons, enclosure of her property and a place for her animals. She <br /> noted that most of the fences she saw in Town were not according to the <br /> Code and believed it unfair that she be treated as though she was asking <br /> for something unusual when indeed she was not. Dr. Foward further <br /> stated that she planned to maintain and landscape the fence and she did <br /> not believe it would be an obstruction to anyone's view. She further <br /> explained the slope of the land and the difficulties of placing a fence on the <br /> slope. November 20, 1991 <br /> 4 <br />