Laserfiche WebLink
` MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Johnson and <br /> passed unanimously by all members present to approve the minutes of the January 17, <br /> 1990 Council Meeting with the following corrections: page 5, insert following line <br /> omitted in original copy of Mrs. Bertram's comments: '. . . .rains last weekend, the <br /> drainage ditch under her driveway became full of silt which had been washed down <br /> from the upper. . .'; page 6, Item 7.1, last sentence of motion, change van Tamelen to <br /> Tryon; page 6, Item 7.2, insert the following after the word 'applicant' in motion: <br /> 'rather than staff; page 9, under roll call vote, show van Tamelen absent as well as <br /> Siegel; page 9, third paragraph amended as follows: '. . . .also had other concerns with <br /> the adoption of this policy.'page 12, Item 11.2, last sentence of first paragraph, change <br /> the words 'staff report' to 'comments'; page 13, Item 11.5, change sentence as follows: <br /> 'Tryon asked that the City Manager contact Mrs. Dru Anderson regarding this matter.' <br /> and page 14, Item 11.9, last paragraph should read: ' . . . .served on the Community <br /> Support Committee which raised funds for CHAC and although . . . .' <br /> 4.2 Approval of Warrants: $69,795.60 (1/17/90) <br /> vanTamelen questioned two reimbursement expenses to the Mayor for the League of <br /> 4110, California Cities Conference in San Francisco and lunches with staff and asked that <br /> both of these be agendized for the next Council Meeting. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by van Tamelen <br /> and passed unanimously by all members present to approve the warrant list dated <br /> 1/17/90 with the following two exceptions: Reimbursements to Mayor for $598.97 <br /> League of California Cities 12/16 -- 12/19/89 and $16.00 lunch with City Attorney and to <br /> agendize these items for the next Council Meeting. <br /> 4.6 Actions of the Planning Commission: approved the following: <br /> 4.6.1 Variance for Secondary Unit, Lands of Burger, 25325 La Loma Drive <br /> Casey questioned whether it was appropriate to place conditions on a variance rather <br /> than to require them at time of Site Development. The City Attorney responded that it <br /> was appropriate to place conditions on a variance. However, the Mayor stated that she <br /> did not agree that this was the appropriate time to place restrictions on a project <br /> particularly those regarding particulars of development such as '. . .with single story <br /> elements not to exceed 18 feet at any single point.' Casey stated that she believed the <br /> Site Development process was the appropriate time to place such conditions on a <br /> Ilw <br /> February 7, 1990 <br /> 3 <br />