My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/05/1990
LOSALTOSHILLS
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Minutes
>
1990
>
12/05/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2015 3:41:26 PM
Creation date
6/5/2015 3:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
Date
1990-12-05
Description
Regular Meeting Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
for a variance finding and noted that the Lukes believed their fence was <br /> included in their original building permit. Casey further stated that it was <br /> an open fence and urged consistency and fairness when considering these <br /> applications. <br /> Dot Schreiner, Chairman - Pathways, Recreation and Parks Committee, noted <br /> that there was a path along Bryne Park Lane, in front of the fence and also <br /> commented that the Lukes need to roughen their driveway. <br /> Theresa McDaniel, Chairman - Environmental, Design and Protection <br /> Committee, stated that no one seemed to be addressing the issue that the <br /> Lukes built a fence without a permit and regarding the deer, she did not <br /> think they created extraordinary circumstances as practically everyone in <br /> Town had them. <br /> Bob Stutz, 25310 Elena, noted that Mr. Packard had removed one or two rows of <br /> apricots to put in his fence. <br /> Siegel commented that it seemed like the Lukes were trying to enclose their <br /> property. Johnson understood the difficulties the applicant was going <br /> through. There were inconsistencies in the Town regarding granting <br /> permission to build oversize fences. Just recently the Council had <br /> `r approved a fence for Paulnock which he had voted against. It seemed <br /> unfair to him to grant one fence and not the other. Johnson also asked if <br /> it was practical for the Lukes to move their fence and the response was no <br /> it was not. It was pointed out that the Paulnock property was surrounded <br /> by streets on three sides which made for extraordinary circumstances. <br /> Tryon agreed that there were a lot of inconsistencies regarding the fence <br /> ordinance but she was finding it very difficult to make the variance <br /> findings. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND WITHDRAWN: Moved by Siegel, seconded by <br /> Casey motion withdrawn to continue this public hearing to the next <br /> meeting. <br /> MOTION FAILED DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND: Moved by Casey to approve <br /> the request for a variance to the height/setback requirements for a fence <br /> for Lands of Luke based on the following findings: shape of lot, location of <br /> house, right to privacy which other residents enjoy, sense of fairness, and <br /> comon sense. <br /> December 5, 1990 <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.