Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Siegel, seconded by Johnson <br /> 4111, and passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the December 5, 1990 <br /> Adjourned Regular Meeting. <br /> 4.1 Approval of Minutes: December 5, 1990 (Regular Meeting) <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Tryon, seconded by Siegel <br /> and passed unanimously to approve the minutes of the December 5, 1990 <br /> Regular Meeting with the following corrections: page 4, item 4.7, second <br /> paragraph, second sentence, change 'an addition of' to 'a separate structure <br /> of' and page 9, state Tryon's comments on Hau before the motion. <br /> 4.2 Approval of Warrants: $96,265.73(12/5/90) <br /> Casey asked that the warrants be removed from the Consent Calendar because <br /> there were two warrants which referred to items on the agenda and she <br /> wanted to bring them to Council's attention. Specifically, the $2,500 bill <br /> from PRX for the Town's logo and the $4,224.99 charge for PERS health <br /> benefits. It was agreed that the warrants could be approved at this time <br /> with discussion of these issues to be conducted later in the meeting. <br /> MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED: Moved by Johnson, seconded by <br /> Hubbard and passed unanimously to approve the 12/5/90 warrants in the <br /> iir amount of $96,265.73 <br /> 4.3 Consideration of Whether To Concur with or Review the following <br /> Planning Commission Actions at Its Meeting on December 12, 1990: <br /> 4.3a Review and Modification of the Conditional Use Permit, Lands <br /> of St. Nicholas School, 12816 El Monte Avenue <br /> Tryon questioned the condition that stated that the use of lighting shall be <br /> limited to times when faculty and staff are present and wondered if it <br /> should be changed to allowing the lights to be on until 11 or 12 at night in <br /> case a teacher had to return the school. The Planning Director noted that <br /> they only had about 12 special events a year and Casey commented that the <br /> school did not want the lights on all the time. Planning Commissioner <br /> Comiso noted that this issue would be discussed again in 1992 in <br /> conjunction with the Clausen subdivision. <br /> Hubbard questioned the condition related to the public address system and <br /> whether there should be a phrase included stipulating no annoyance to <br /> the neighbors. It was pointed out that this condition had been in place for <br /> a long time and there had been no problems. Council could review a <br /> conditional use permit at any time there was a perceived nuisance. <br /> December 19, 1990 <br /> 3 <br />